Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34127855›Full record

ArticleNature methods2021

Structured illumination microscopy with noise-controlled image reconstructions.

Carlas S Smith, Johan A Slotman, Lothar Schermelleh, Nadya Chakrova, Sangeetha Hari, Yoram Vos, Cornelis W Hagen, Marcel Müller, Wiggert van Cappellen, Adriaan B Houtsmuller and 2 more

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Image restoration in frequency space using complex-valued CNNs.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carlas S SmithDepartment of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0591-5093
Johan A SlotmanDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Optical Imaging Centre, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9705-9620
Lothar SchermellehMicron Advanced Bioimaging Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1612-9699
Nadya ChakrovaDepartment of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Sangeetha HariDepartment of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Yoram VosDepartment of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Cornelis W HagenDepartment of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Marcel MüllerBiochemistry, Molecular and Structural Biology Section, Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-3643
Wiggert van CappellenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Optical Imaging Centre, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9059-8365
Adriaan B HoutsmullerDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus Optical Imaging Centre, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jacob P HoogenboomDepartment of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4539-8772
Sjoerd StallingaDepartment of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. s.stallinga@tudelft.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-3272

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 107457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Super-resolution structured illumination microscopy (SIM) has become a widely used method for biological imaging. Standard reconstruction algorithms, however, are prone to generate noise-specific artifacts that limit their applicability for lower signal-to-noise data. Here we present a physically realistic noise model that explains the structured noise artifact, which we then use to motivate new complementary reconstruction approaches. True-Wiener-filtered SIM optimizes contrast given the available signal-to-noise ratio, and flat-noise SIM fully overcomes the structured noise artifact while maintaining resolving power. Both methods eliminate ad hoc user-adjustable reconstruction parameters in favor of physical parameters, enhancing objectivity. The new reconstructions point to a trade-off between contrast and a natural noise appearance. This trade-off can be partly overcome by further notch filtering but at the expense of a decrease in signal-to-noise ratio. The benefits of the proposed approaches are demonstrated on focal adhesion and tubulin samples in two and three dimensions, and on nanofabricated fluorescent test patterns.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsCell LineGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMiceMicroscopySignal-To-Noise RatioZyxinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsZyxinZYX protein, human

Identifiers

PMID34127855
PMCPMC7611169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.