Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34127782›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Insights into the genomic evolution of insects from cricket genomes.

Guillem Ylla, Taro Nakamura, Takehiko Itoh, Rei Kajitani, Atsushi Toyoda, Sayuri Tomonari, Tetsuya Bando, Yoshiyasu Ishimaru, Takahito Watanabe, Masao Fuketa and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. A genome survey ofZooKeys · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Guillem YllaDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. guillemyllabou@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4540-0131
Taro NakamuraDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8341-3115
Takehiko ItohSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-557X
Rei KajitaniSchool of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5013-0052
Atsushi ToyodaComparative Genomics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0728-7548
Sayuri TomonariDepartment of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7017-7499
Tetsuya BandoGraduate School of Medicine, Pharmacology and Dentistry, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Yoshiyasu IshimaruDepartment of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Takahito WatanabeDepartment of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Masao FuketaGraduate School of Advanced Technology and Science, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Yuji MatsuokaDepartment of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Austen A BarnettDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4290-7594
Sumihare NojiDepartment of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4441-1672
Taro MitoDepartment of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan. mito.taro@tokushima-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-3574-972X
Cassandra G ExtavourDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. extavour@oeb.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2922-5855
Tokushima University · JPHarvard University · USTokyo Institute of Technology · JPNational Institute of Genetics · JPNational University of Singapore · SGOkayama University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of our knowledge of insect genomes comes from Holometabolous species, which undergo complete metamorphosis and have genomes typically under 2 Gb with little signs of DNA methylation. In contrast, Hemimetabolous insects undergo the presumed ancestral process of incomplete metamorphosis, and have larger genomes with high levels of DNA methylation. Hemimetabolous species from the Orthopteran order (grasshoppers and crickets) have some of the largest known insect genomes. What drives the evolution of these unusual insect genome sizes, remains unknown. Here we report the sequencing, assembly and annotation of the 1.66-Gb genome of the Mediterranean field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, and the annotation of the 1.60-Gb genome of the Hawaiian cricket Laupala kohalensis. We compare these two cricket genomes with those of 14 additional insects and find evidence that hemimetabolous genomes expanded due to transposable element activity. Based on the ratio of observed to expected CpG sites, we find higher conservation and stronger purifying selection of methylated genes than non-methylated genes. Finally, our analysis suggests an expansion of the pickpocket class V gene family in crickets, which we speculate might play a role in the evolution of cricket courtship, including their characteristic chirping.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsDNA MethylationDNA Transposable ElementsFemaleGenes, InsectGenome, InsectGryllidaeInsectaMalePhylogenyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Analysis, DNADNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID34127782
PMCPMC8203789
OpenAlexW3171908035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.