Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34127672›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2021

First-year students' math anxiety predicts STEM avoidance and underperformance throughout university, independently of math ability.

Richard J Daker, Sylvia U Gattas, H Moriah Sokolowski, Adam E Green, Ian M Lyons

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Self-regulated learning in STEM: non-academics matter.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025
    Article
  18. Math anxiety and arithmetic learning: Evidence for impaired procedural learning and enhanced retrieval learning.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2025
    Article
  19. Supporting Mental Health Among STEM Students: The REDFLAGS Model.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  20. More Than Just Anxiety: Math Attitudes as Key Driver of University Choice.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Richard J DakerDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., United States. rjd107@georgetown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7416-4791
Sylvia U GattasDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
H Moriah SokolowskiRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Adam E GreenDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., United States.
Ian M LyonsDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., United States.
Georgetown University · USBaycrest Hospital · CAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Math anxiety is widely considered a potential barrier to success in STEM. Current thinking holds that math anxiety is directly linked to avoidance of and underperformance in STEM domains. However, past evidence supporting these claims is limited in important ways. Perhaps most crucially, it is possible that math anxiety predicts STEM outcomes merely as a proxy for poor math skills. Here, we tested the link between math anxiety and subsequent STEM outcomes by measuring math anxiety, math ability, and several covariates in 183 first-semester university students. We then tracked students' STEM avoidance and achievement through four years at university via official academic transcripts. Results showed that math anxiety predicted both a reduction in how many STEM courses students took and, separately (i.e., controlling for one another), lower STEM grades. Crucially, these associations held after controlling for math ability (and other covariates). That math anxiety predicts math-related academic achievement independently of Math Ability suggests that, contrary to current thinking, math anxiety's effects on academic performance likely operate via mechanisms other than negatively affecting math ability. Beyond this, we show evidence that math anxiety can account for associations between math ability and STEM outcomes, suggesting that past links between math ability and real-world outcomes may, in fact, be at least partially explainable by attitudes toward math. These findings provide clear impetus for developing and testing interventions that target math anxiety specifically and suggest that focusing on math ability without additional attention to math anxiety may fail to optimally boost STEM outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID34127672
PMCPMC8203776
OpenAlexW3170310281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.