Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34127002›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2021

Public support for healthy supermarket initiatives focused on product placement: a multi-country cross-sectional analysis of the 2018 International Food Policy Study.

Clara Gómez-Donoso, Gary Sacks, Lana Vanderlee, David Hammond, Christine M White, Claudia Nieto, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Adrian J Cameron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Clara Gómez-DonosoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Gary SacksGlobal Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood VIC, Geelong, 3125, Australia.
Lana VanderleeCentre Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la nutrition et les aliments fonctionnels, École de nutrition, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
David HammondSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Christine M WhiteSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Claudia NietoCentro de Investigación en Nutrición y Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Maira Bes-RastrolloDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Adrian J CameronGlobal Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood VIC, Geelong, 3125, Australia. adrian.cameron@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0568-5497
Deakin University · AUInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversity of Waterloo · CAInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood retail environments have an influential role in shaping purchasing behavior and could contribute to improving dietary patterns at a population level. However, little is known about the level of public support for different types of initiatives to encourage healthy food choices in supermarkets, and whether this varies across countries or context. The current study aimed to explore the level of support for three potential supermarket initiatives focused on product placement across five countries, and factors that may influence this support.

methodsA total of 22,264 adults from Australia, Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom and the United States (US) provided information on support for three supermarket initiatives related to product placement (targeting product positioning: 'checkouts with only healthy products', 'fewer end-of-aisle displays containing unhealthy foods or soft drinks' or availability: 'more shelf space for fresh and healthier foods') as part of the online 2018 International Food Policy Study. The proportion of respondents that supported each initiative was assessed across countries, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the influence of sociodemographic factors on support.

resultsThe initiative that received the highest support was 'more shelf space for fresh and healthier foods': 72.0% [95% CI 71.3-72.7], whereas 'checkouts with only healthy products' received the lowest support: 48.6% [95% CI 47.8-49.4]. The level of support differed between countries (p < 0.001 for all initiatives), with the US generally showing the lowest support and Mexico the highest. Noteworthy, in the overall sample, there was not much opposition to any of the initiatives (2.5-14.2%), whereas there was a large proportion of neutral responses (25.5-37.2%). Respondents who were older, female, highly educated, and those who reported having more nutrition knowledge tended to be more supportive, with several differences between countries and initiatives.

conclusionsMost people in the assessed five countries showed a generally high level of support for three placement initiatives in supermarkets to encourage healthy food choices. Support varied by type of initiative (i.e., product positioning or availability) and was influenced by several factors related to country context and sociodemographic characteristics. This evidence could prompt and guide retailers and policy makers to take stronger action to promote healthy food choices in stores.

Indexed as

Food MarketsFood SupplyAdultCommerceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFoodHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition PolicyAttitudesDietFood environmentFood policyRetailSupermarket

Identifiers

PMID34127002
PMCPMC8201822
OpenAlexW3172510563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.