Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34126932›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Increased peak detection accuracy in over-dispersed ChIP-seq data with supervised segmentation models.

Arnaud Liehrmann, Guillem Rigaill, Toby Dylan Hocking

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arnaud LiehrmannInstitut des Sciences des Plantes de Paris-Saclay (IPS2), Université Paris-Saclay, Université Evry, CNRS, INRAE, 91405, Orsay, France. arnaud.liehrmann@universite-paris-saclay.fr.
Guillem RigaillInstitut des Sciences des Plantes de Paris-Saclay (IPS2), Université Paris-Saclay, Université Evry, CNRS, INRAE, 91405, Orsay, France.
Toby Dylan HockingSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems (SICCS), Northern Arizona University, 86011, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistone modification constitutes a basic mechanism for the genetic regulation of gene expression. In early 2000s, a powerful technique has emerged that couples chromatin immunoprecipitation with high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq). This technique provides a direct survey of the DNA regions associated to these modifications. In order to realize the full potential of this technique, increasingly sophisticated statistical algorithms have been developed or adapted to analyze the massive amount of data it generates. Many of these algorithms were built around natural assumptions such as the Poisson distribution to model the noise in the count data. In this work we start from these natural assumptions and show that it is possible to improve upon them.

resultsOur comparisons on seven reference datasets of histone modifications (H3K36me3 & H3K4me3) suggest that natural assumptions are not always realistic under application conditions. We show that the unconstrained multiple changepoint detection model with alternative noise assumptions and supervised learning of the penalty parameter reduces the over-dispersion exhibited by count data. These models, implemented in the R package CROCS ( https://github.com/aLiehrmann/CROCS ), detect the peaks more accurately than algorithms which rely on natural assumptions.

conclusionThe segmentation models we propose can benefit researchers in the field of epigenetics by providing new high-quality peak prediction tracks for H3K36me3 and H3K4me3 histone modifications.

Indexed as

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAlgorithmsChromatin ImmunoprecipitationSequence Analysis, DNAChIP-seqHistone modificationsLikelihood inferenceMultiple changepoint detectionOver-dispersionPeak callingSupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID34126932
PMCPMC8201703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.