Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34126920›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2021

Identification of genomic regions affecting production traits in pigs divergently selected for feed efficiency.

Emilie Delpuech, Amir Aliakbari, Yann Labrune, Katia Fève, Yvon Billon, Hélène Gilbert, Juliette Riquet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genome-Wide Association Study of Feed Efficiency Related Traits in Ducks.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emilie DelpuechGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31320, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Amir AliakbariGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31320, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Yann LabruneGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31320, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Katia FèveGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31320, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Yvon BillonGenESI, INRAE, 17700, Surgères, France.
Hélène GilbertGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31320, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Juliette RiquetGenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31320, Castanet-Tolosan, France. juliette.riquet@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7787-031X
École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-08-GENM-038Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CE20-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeed efficiency is a major driver of the sustainability of pig production systems. Understanding the biological mechanisms that underlie these agronomic traits is an important issue for environment questions and farms' economy. This study aimed at identifying genomic regions that affect residual feed intake (RFI) and other production traits in two pig lines divergently selected for RFI during nine generations (LRFI, low RFI; HRFI, high RFI).

resultsWe built a whole dataset of 570,447 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 2426 pigs with records for 24 production traits after both imputation and prediction of genotypes using pedigree information. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed including both lines (global-GWAS) or each line independently (LRFI-GWAS and HRFI-GWAS). Forty-five chromosomal regions were detected in the global-GWAS, whereas 28 and 42 regions were detected in the HRFI-GWAS and LRFI-GWAS, respectively. Among these 45 regions, only 13 were shared between at least two analyses, and only one was common between the three GWAS but it affects different traits. Among the five quantitative trait loci (QTL) detected for RFI, two were close to QTL for meat quality traits and two pinpointed novel genomic regions that harbor candidate genes involved in cell proliferation and differentiation processes of gastrointestinal tissues or in lipid metabolism-related signaling pathways. In most cases, different QTL regions were detected between the three designs, which suggests a strong impact of the dataset structure on the detection power and could be due to the changes in allelic frequencies during the establishment of lines.

conclusionsIn addition to efficiently detecting known and new QTL regions for feed efficiency, the combination of GWAS carried out per line or simultaneously using all individuals highlighted chromosomal regions that affect production traits and presented significant changes in allelic frequencies across generations. Further analyses are needed to estimate whether these regions correspond to traces of selection or result from genetic drift.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociSelective BreedingAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsGene FrequencyQuantitative Trait, HeritableSwineWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID34126920
PMCPMC8201702
OpenAlexW3173039074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.