Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34126827›Full record

ArticleExpert opinion on drug discovery2021

Assigning confidence to molecular property prediction.

AkshatKumar Nigam, Robert Pollice, Matthew F D Hurley, Riley J Hickman, Matteo Aldeghi, Naruki Yoshikawa, Seyone Chithrananda, Vincent A Voelz, Alán Aspuru-Guzik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

AkshatKumar NigamChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Robert PolliceChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Matthew F D HurleyDepartment of Chemistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
Riley J HickmanChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Matteo AldeghiChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Naruki YoshikawaChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Seyone ChithranandaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Vincent A VoelzDepartment of Chemistry, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
Alán Aspuru-GuzikChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

Markov State Model approaches for folding, binding and designR01GM123296 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI VOELZ, VINCENT · 2017 to 2025
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMachine LearningComputer SimulationHumansUncertaintyartificial intelligencedeep learningdockingdrug discoverygenerative modelsmodel uncertainty estimationmolecular dynamicsNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID34126827
PMCPMC9449894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.