Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34126702›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2022

Machine Learning Model for Predicting Postoperative Survival of Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Mohamed Hosny Osman, Reham Hosny Mohamed, Hossam Mohamed Sarhan, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Jeonghyun Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohamed Hosny OsmanFaculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Reham Hosny MohamedFaculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Hossam Mohamed SarhanFaculty of Pharmacy, British University in Egypt (BUE), El Shorouk, Egypt.
Eun Jung ParkDepartment of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Hyuk BaikDepartment of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kang Young LeeDepartment of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jeonghyun KangDepartment of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMachine learning (ML) is a strong candidate for making accurate predictions, as we can use large amount of data with powerful computational algorithms. We developed a ML based model to predict survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) using data from two independent datasets. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 364,316 and 1,572 CRC patients were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and a Korean dataset, respectively. As SEER combines data from 18 cancer registries, internal validation was done using 18-Fold-Cross-Validation then external validation was performed by testing the trained model on the Korean dataset. Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity and positive predictive values.

resultsClinicopathological characteristics were significantly different between the two datasets and the SEER showed a significant lower 5-year survival rate compared to the Korean dataset (60.1% vs. 75.3%, p < 0.001). The ML-based model using the Light gradient boosting algorithm achieved a better performance in predicting 5-year-survival compared to American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (AUROC, 0.804 vs. 0.736; p < 0.001). The most important features which influenced model performance were age, number of examined lymph nodes, and tumor size. Sensitivity and positive predictive values of predicting 5-year-survival for classes including dead or alive were reported as 68.14%, 77.51% and 49.88%, 88.1% respectively in the validation set. Survival probability can be checked using the web-based survival predictor (http://colorectalcancer.pythonanywhere.com).

conclusionML-based model achieved a much better performance compared to staging in individualized estimation of survival of patients with CRC.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMachine LearningHumansPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveSurvival RateArea under the curveColorectal neoplasmsLightGBMMachine learningMortalitySEER

Identifiers

PMID34126702
PMCPMC9016295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.