Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34126646›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of perinatology2023

Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy of Neonates with Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Systematic Review.

Daniele Donà, Andrea Gastaldi, Elisa Barbieri, Luca Bonadies, Jalemba Aluvaala, Mike English

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of perinatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Synbiotics: An Emerging Frontier in Infectious Diseases Control.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniele DonàDivision of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Woman and Child Health, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Andrea GastaldiDepartment of Pediatrics, Woman and Child Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8110-210X
Elisa BarbieriDivision of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Woman and Child Health, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Luca BonadiesNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Jalemba AluvaalaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mike EnglishHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
University of Padua · ITKenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Nairobi · KEUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNecrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is an inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract characterized by ischemic necrosis of the intestinal mucosa, mostly affecting premature neonates. Management of NEC includes medical care and surgical approaches, with supportive care and empirical antibiotic therapy recommended to avoid any disease progression. However, there is still no clear evidence-based consensus on empiric antibiotic strategies or surgical timing. This study was aimed to review the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of different antibiotic regimens for NEC. STUDY

designMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were systematically searched through May 31, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized interventions reporting data on predefined outcomes related to NEC treatments were included. Clinical trials were assessed using the criteria and standard methods of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials, while the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. The certainty in evidence of each outcome's effects was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

resultsFive studies were included in this review, two RCTs and three observational studies, for a total amount of 3,161 patients. One RCT compared the outcomes of parenteral (ampicillin plus gentamicin) and oral (gentamicin) treatment with parenteral only. Three studies (one RCT and two observational) evaluated adding anaerobic coverage to different parenteral regimens. The last observational study compared two different parenteral antibiotic combinations (ampicillin and gentamicin vs. cefotaxime and vancomycin).

conclusionNo antimicrobial regimen has been shown to be superior to ampicillin and gentamicin in decreasing mortality and preventing clinical deterioration in NEC. The use of additional antibiotics providing anaerobic coverage, typically metronidazole, or use of other broad-spectrum regimens as first-line empiric therapy is not supported by the very limited current evidence. Well-conducted, appropriately sized comparative trials are needed to make evidence-based recommendations. KEY POINTS: · Ampicillin and gentamicin are effective in decreasing mortality and preventing clinical deterioration in NEC.. · Metronidazole could be added in patients with surgical NEC.. · No study with high-quality evidence was found..

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFetal DiseasesInfant, Newborn, DiseasesAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleGentamicinsHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMetronidazoleObservational Studies as TopicAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsGentamicinsMetronidazole

Identifiers

PMID34126646
PMCPMC7614399
OpenAlexW3168591796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.