Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34126052›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. HIV2021

Incorporating oral PrEP into standard prevention services for South African women: a nested interrupted time-series study.

Deborah Donnell, Ivana Beesham, Julia D Welch, Renee Heffron, Melanie Pleaner, Lara Kidoguchi, Thesla Palanee-Phillips, Khatija Ahmed, Deborah Baron, Elizabeth A Bukusi and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. HIV, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02550067 (A Multi Center, Open-Label, Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing HIV Incidence and Contraceptive Benefits in Women Using Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02550067 nacompletednot on this map

A Multi Center, Open-Label, Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing HIV Incidence and Contraceptive Benefits in Women Using Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DMPA), Levonorgestrel (LNG) Implant, and Copper Intrauterine Devices (IUDs)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFHI 360Ran2015 to 2018Enrolled7,830ConditionsHIV, ContraceptionArmsDMPA, LNG, Copper IUD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Lenacapavir for HIV Prevention: A Commitment to Equitable Access and Partnership by Gilead Sciences.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Deborah DonnellFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Seattle, WA, USA; University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: deborah@fredhutch.org.
Ivana BeeshamMatCH Research Unit (MRU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Julia D WelchFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Renee HeffronUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Melanie PleanerWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lara KidoguchiUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Thesla Palanee-PhillipsWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Khatija AhmedSetshaba Research Centre, Tshwane, South Africa.
Deborah BaronWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Elizabeth A BukusiUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya.
Cheryl LouwMadibeng Centre for Research, Brits, South Africa; Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Timothy D MastroFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer SmitMatCH Research Unit (MRU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Joanne R BattingEffective Care Research Unit (ECRU), Universities of the Witwatersrand, Fort Hare and Eastern Cape Department of Health, East London, South Africa.
Mookho MalahlehaSetshaba Research Centre, Tshwane, South Africa.
Veronique C BaileySetshaba Research Centre, Tshwane, South Africa.
Mags BeksinskaMatCH Research Unit (MRU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Helen ReesWits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jared M BaetenUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.
ECHO Trial Consortium
University of the Witwatersrand · ZASetshaba Research Centre · ZAUniversity of Washington · USFamily Health International 360 · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Pretoria · ZAWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) becomes the standard of prevention globally, its potential effect on HIV incidence in clinical trials of new prevention interventions is unknown, particularly for trials among women. In a trial measuring HIV incidence in African women, oral PrEP was incorporated into the standard of prevention in the trial's last year. We assessed the effect of on-site access to PrEP on HIV incidence in this natural experiment.

methodsWe did a nested interrupted time-series study using data from the ECHO trial. At 12 sites in four countries (Eswatini, Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia), women (aged 16-35 years) were randomly assigned to receive one of three contraceptives between Dec 14, 2015, and Sept 12, 2017, and followed up quarterly for up to 18 months to determine the effect of contraceptive method on HIV acquisition. Women were eligible if they wanted long-acting contraception, were medically qualified to receive study contraceptives, and had not used any of the study contraceptives in the past 6 months. The present analyses are limited to nine South African sites where on-site access to oral PrEP was implemented between March 13 and June 12, 2018. Using an interrupted time-series design, we compared HIV incidence before versus after PrEP access, limited to quarterly study visits at which on-site PrEP access was available to at least some participants and, in a sensitivity analysis, to the 180 days before and after access. The outcome was incident HIV infection, detected using two rapid HIV tests done in parallel for each participant at every scheduled follow-up visit. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02550067.

findings2124 women were followed up after on-site PrEP access began, of whom 543 (26%) reported PrEP use. A total of 12 HIV seroconversions were observed in 556 person-years (incidence 2·16%) after on-site PrEP access, compared with 133 HIV seroconversions in 2860 person-years (4·65%) before PrEP access (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·45, 95% CI 0·25-0·82, p=0·0085). Similar results were also observed when limiting the analysis to 180 days before versus after PrEP access. A total of 46 HIV seroconversions were observed in 919 person-years within 180 days before PrEP access, compared with 11 seroconversions in 481 person-years in the 180 days following PrEP access (incidence 5·00 vs 2·29 per 100 person-years; IRR 0·43, 95% CI 0·22-0·88, p=0·012).

interpretationOn-site access to PrEP as part of standard of prevention in a clinical trial among women in South Africa was associated with halving HIV incidence, when approximately a quarter of women started PrEP. Providing access to on-site PrEP could decrease incidence in HIV prevention trials. These data are also among the first to show in any setting that access to PrEP is associated with decreased HIV acquisition among South African women.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, United States Agency for International Development, President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, South African Medical Research Council, and United Nations Population Fund.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceSouth AfricaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34126052
PMCPMC8340029
OpenAlexW3170630453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.