SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2021
Intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05701332 (Effect of Intravesical B.C.G and Gemcitabine on Semen Quality and Testicular Volume in Patients With Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Intravesical B.C.G and Gemcitabine on Semen Quality and Testicular Volume in Patients With Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of Effective Intravesical Therapies on Quality of Life in Patients with Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Blue versus white light for transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Intravesical gemcitabine for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: An abridged Cochrane Review.Investigative and clinical urology · 2021Pooled it
- TAR-200 for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-Unresponsive High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Results From the Phase IIb SunRISe-1 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Pharmacokinetics of UGN‑102, an investigational mitomycin‑containing reverse thermal gel for the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2025Trial
- Gemcitabine-Based Bladder Preservation in BCG-Unresponsive High-Risk NMIBC: Evidence, Limitations, and Clinical Positioning.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Oncological Outcomes of Epirubicin-based Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy in Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-naïve Patients and Patients with BCG Failure: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a gemcitabine sensitivity-related long noncoding RNA signature for predicting the prognosis and subtypes of bladder cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- KNTC1 initiates a KNTC1/E2F8/MYC positive feedback loop to facilitate tumorigenesis and enhance chemoresistance in bladder cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Treatments for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive Carcinoma in Situ of the Bladder.European urology · 2026Article
- Impact of protocolized intravesical instillation after TURBT on men's sexual quality of life:a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- Systemic Chemotherapy in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Evidence-Based Regimens.Cancers · 2025Review
- Enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of gemcitabine in bladder cancer through TGF-β1 inhibition and pluronic F-127-based microsphere delivery.Journal of biological engineering · 2025Article
- LEADR, a p63 target, dampens interferon signalling in bladder cancer.Cell death discovery · 2025Article
- Metabolomic Biomarkers for Prognosis in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2025Review
- Hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy with gemcitabine versus Bacillus Calmette-Guerin in intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- BCG therapy for bladder cancer: Exploring patient experiences and concerns through artificial intelligence-based social media analysis.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- The oncogenic functions of SPARCL1 in bladder cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Nanomedicine in Bladder Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt remains unclear whether people with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) benefit from intravesical gemcitabine compared to other agents in the primary or recurrent setting following transurethral resection of a bladder tumor. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2012. Since that time, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been reported, making this update relevant.
objectivesTo assess the comparative effectiveness and toxicity of intravesical gemcitabine instillation for NMIBC. SEARCH
methodsWe performed a comprehensive literature search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases, trial registries, and conference proceedings to 11 September 2020, with no restrictions on the language or status of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs in which participants received intravesical gemcitabine for primary or recurrent NMIBC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the included studies and extracted data for the primary outcomes: time to recurrence, time to progression, grade III to V adverse events determined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0), and the secondary outcomes: time to death from bladder cancer, time to death from any cause, grade I or II adverse events determined by the CTCAE v5.0 and disease-specific quality of life. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and rated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN
resultsWe included seven studies with 1222 participants with NMIBC across five comparisons. This abstract focuses on the primary outcomes of the three most clinically relevant comparisons. 1. Gemcitabine versus saline: based on two years' to four years' follow-up, gemcitabine may reduce the risk of recurrence over time compared to saline (39% versus 47% recurrence rate, hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54 to 1.09; studies = 2, participants = 734; I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.