Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34125884›Full record

ArticleGenetics2021

Revisiting the notion of deleterious sweeps.

Parul Johri, Brian Charlesworth, Emma K Howell, Michael Lynch, Jeffrey D Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards an evolutionary baseline model ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Maintenance of Deleterious Variation in Wild Chinese Rhesus Macaques.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of Selection at Linked Sites on Patterns of Genetic Variability.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Parul JohriSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Brian CharlesworthInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2706-355X
Emma K HowellSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Michael LynchSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Jeffrey D JensenSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PERNA, NICOLE T · 1985 to 2023
$16.5M
Causes and Population-genetic Consequences of Molecular VariationR35GM122566 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Michael R LYNCH · 2017 to 2026
$7.7M
On differentiating selective and neutral evolutionary processesR35GM139383 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI JENSEN, JEFFREY D · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Developing novel statistics and coalescent approaches for the improved study of virus evolution R01GM135899 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI JENSEN, JEFFREY D · 2019 to 2020
$367k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135899NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122566NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139383NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has previously been shown that, conditional on its fixation, the time to fixation of a semi-dominant deleterious autosomal mutation in a randomly mating population is the same as that of an advantageous mutation. This result implies that deleterious mutations could generate selective sweep-like effects. Although their fixation probabilities greatly differ, the much larger input of deleterious relative to beneficial mutations suggests that this phenomenon could be important. We here examine how the fixation of mildly deleterious mutations affects levels and patterns of polymorphism at linked sites-both in the presence and absence of interference amongst deleterious mutations-and how this class of sites may contribute to divergence between-populations and species. We find that, while deleterious fixations are unlikely to represent a significant proportion of outliers in polymorphism-based genomic scans within populations, minor shifts in the frequencies of deleterious mutations can influence the proportions of private variants and the value of FST after a recent population split. As sites subject to deleterious mutations are necessarily found in functional genomic regions, interpretations in terms of recurrent positive selection may require reconsideration.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticAllelesAnimalsGenetic VariationHumansdeleterious mutationsgenetic hitchhikingpopulation geneticsselective sweeps

Identifiers

PMID34125884
PMCPMC9101445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.