Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34125503›Full record

Trial reportTherapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy2022

Expanded hemodialysis as effective alternative to on-line hemodiafiltration: A randomized mid-term clinical trial.

Fernando Hadad-Arrascue, Lars-Göran Nilsson, Angela S Rivera, Angelito A Bernardo, Juan B Cabezuelo Romero

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03499691 (An Open-label, Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Exploratory Study to Explore the Safety and Efficacy of the HDx Therapy Using Theranova 500 Dialyzer in Comparison to Hemodiafiltration), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03499691 nacompletednot on this map

An Open-label, Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Exploratory Study to Explore the Safety and Efficacy of the HDx Therapy Using Theranova 500 Dialyzer in Comparison to Hemodiafiltration

TypeinterventionalSponsorVantive Health LLCRan2018 to 2018Enrolled43ConditionsEnd Stage Renal DiseaseArmsTheranova 500 medium cut-off dialyzer, Hemodiafiltration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Expanded hemodialysis as effective alternative to on-line hemodiafiltration: A randomized mid-term clinical trial.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2022
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Removal of uremic toxin by dialysis, what is the issue?Kidney research and clinical practice · 2023
    Article
  11. Expanded hemodialysis: what's up, Doc?Clinical kidney journal · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fernando Hadad-ArrascueRenal Therapy Services, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9446-6116
Lars-Göran NilssonBaxter International Inc., Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4323-2875
Angela S RiveraBaxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2162-7131
Angelito A BernardoBaxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, Illinois, USA.
Juan B Cabezuelo RomeroDepartment of Nephrology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7523-9962
Baxter (United States) · USBaxter (Sweden) · SEHospital Reina Sofía de Murcia · ESIVI Murcia Clinic · ES

Funding

Baxter Healthcare Corporation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expanded hemodialysis (HDx), using medium cut-off membrane, is a novel therapy that effectively clears middle molecules (MMs). We aimed to compare HDx to hemodiafiltration (HDF) in an open randomized clinical study. Patients currently on HDF (age 18-80 years; on HDF >3 months) were randomized to switch to HDx (N = 21) or continue HDF (N = 22) with a 24-week follow-up. Pre- to post-dialysis reduction ratios (RR) and changes in pre-dialysis levels over time were evaluated for MMs and clinical biomarkers. Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) was assessed. HDx showed greater RR for YKL-40 while RR appeared similar between groups for beta

Indexed as

FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemodiafiltrationHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedRenal DialysisSpainTreatment Outcomeerythropoietin resistance indexexpanded hemodialysishemodiafiltrationlarge middle moleculesmedium cut-off membrane

Identifiers

PMID34125503
PMCPMC9290668
OpenAlexW3133146279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.