ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022
Clapping for carers in the Covid-19 crisis: Carers' reflections in a UK survey.
Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moral injury in healthcare workers: causes & interventions.British medical bulletin · 2026Review
- Experiences of seeking and receiving maternity care during a health-system shock: a qualitative study with women and partners in the UK with a focus on marginalised groups.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Public knowledge and attitudes towards antibiotic use across England - pre- and post-pandemic.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Paid care worker organizing in England: priorities and progress?Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Stigmatization experiences of healthcare workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- "Trust people you've never worked with" - A social network visualization of teamwork, cohesion, social support, and mental health in NHS Covid personnel.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Are junior doctors' attitudes towards clinical incidents shifting in the post-COVID era? Introducing the 'Manalayil effect'.Future healthcare journal · 2023Article
- Student nurses, nursing curriculums and emergency responses to Covid-19: A scoping review.Science talks · 2023Article
- Predictors of Post-Traumatic Growth in a Sample of United Kingdom Mental and Community Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- COVID-19 crisis management of German ICU clinicians in leadership - a metaphor analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Exploring Black and South Asian women's experiences of help-seeking and engagement in perinatal mental health services in the UK.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Clapping for carers in the Covid-19 crisis: Carers' reflections in a UK survey.Health & social care in the community · 2022Article
- Decreasing Wellbeing and Increasing Use of Negative Coping Strategies: The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the UK Health and Social Care Workforce.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19 in the UK and Spain: a rapid realist review.Open research Europe · 2022Article
- Exploring the Experiences of Nurses Who Worked During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Arts-Based Inquiry.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper reports and discusses the weekly Clapping for Carers - described as 'front-line heroes' that took place across the United Kingdom during the first national lockdown of the coronavirus pandemic. Data are drawn from a UK-wide online survey of health and social care workers, completed in May to July 2020. The survey received 3,425 responses of which 2,541 were analysed; free-text comments were categorised. One question asked specifically: 'Do you think the "Clap for Carers" was a helpful response from the public?', and 815 comments were provided. Responses were extracted from these 815 free-text comments and categorised as follows: unequivocally Yes, predominantly Yes, mixed feelings, predominantly No and unequivocally No. Most comments revealed mixed feelings about the helpfulness of Clapping with only a minority being entirely supportive. The free-text comments offer some explanations for these views with many feeling that Clapping distracted from the severity of the pandemic and the inadequate resources. The free-text comments reveal workforce concerns that the support demonstrated for the frontline workforce in Clapping might be transitory and that it may not translate into workforce improvements and political commitment to further funding of health and social care. Some saw the value of Clapping as illustrative of community cohesion. There was little mention of Clapping for heroes, and where it was the notion of heroism was rejected. The demonstration of public support in Clapping for Carers may have directly benefitted the public, but only indirectly the workforce. Future recruitment data may help discern if public support has translated into a desire to join the workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.