Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34125450›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Clapping for carers in the Covid-19 crisis: Carers' reflections in a UK survey.

Jill Manthorpe, Steve Iliffe, Patricia Gillen, John Moriarty, John Mallett, Heike Schroder, Denise Currie, Jermaine Ravalier, Paula McFadden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jill ManthorpeThe Policy Institute at King's, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-1410
Steve IliffeResearch Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population Studies, London, UK.
Patricia GillenFaculty of Life and Health Sciences, School of Nursing and Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
John MoriartyQueen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
John MallettUlster University, Coleraine, UK.
Heike SchroderQueen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Denise CurrieQueen's University Management School, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Jermaine RavalierPsychology, Bath Spa University, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8418-4841
Paula McFaddenSocial Work, Ulster University, Londonderry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports and discusses the weekly Clapping for Carers - described as 'front-line heroes' that took place across the United Kingdom during the first national lockdown of the coronavirus pandemic. Data are drawn from a UK-wide online survey of health and social care workers, completed in May to July 2020. The survey received 3,425 responses of which 2,541 were analysed; free-text comments were categorised. One question asked specifically: 'Do you think the "Clap for Carers" was a helpful response from the public?', and 815 comments were provided. Responses were extracted from these 815 free-text comments and categorised as follows: unequivocally Yes, predominantly Yes, mixed feelings, predominantly No and unequivocally No. Most comments revealed mixed feelings about the helpfulness of Clapping with only a minority being entirely supportive. The free-text comments offer some explanations for these views with many feeling that Clapping distracted from the severity of the pandemic and the inadequate resources. The free-text comments reveal workforce concerns that the support demonstrated for the frontline workforce in Clapping might be transitory and that it may not translate into workforce improvements and political commitment to further funding of health and social care. Some saw the value of Clapping as illustrative of community cohesion. There was little mention of Clapping for heroes, and where it was the notion of heroism was rejected. The demonstration of public support in Clapping for Carers may have directly benefitted the public, but only indirectly the workforce. Future recruitment data may help discern if public support has translated into a desire to join the workforce.

Indexed as

COVID-19CaregiversCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsUnited KingdomcarersclappingcoronavirusCovid-19surveyworkforce

Identifiers

PMID34125450
PMCPMC8444820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.