Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34125433›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2021

Fragmentation in the future of work: A horizon scan examining the impact of the changing nature of work on workers experiencing vulnerability.

Arif Jetha, Ali Shamaee, Silvia Bonaccio, Monique A M Gignac, Lori B Tucker, Emile Tompa, Ute Bültmann, Cameron D Norman, Cristina G Banks, Peter M Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Arif JethaInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0322-7027
Ali ShamaeeInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Silvia BonaccioTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1509-5028
Monique A M GignacInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4445-3274
Lori B TuckerBritish Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4314-6750
Emile TompaInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9851-3853
Ute BültmannCommunity and Occupational Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9589-9220
Cameron D NormanCense Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cristina G BanksInterdisciplinary Center for Healthy Workplaces, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Peter M SmithInstitute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8286-4563
University of Toronto · CACanadian Economics Association · CAInstitute for Work & Health · CAUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAWorkplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe future of work is characterized by changes that could disrupt all aspects of the nature and availability of work. Our study aims to understand how the future of work could result in conditions, which contribute to vulnerability for different groups of workers.

methodsA horizon scan was conducted to systematically identify and synthesize diverse sources of evidence, including academic and gray literature and resources shared over social media. Evidence was synthesized, and trend categories were developed through iterative discussions among the research team.

resultsNine trend categories were uncovered, which included the digital transformation of the economy, artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning-enhanced automation, AI-enabled human resource management systems, skill requirements for the future of work; globalization 4.0, climate change and the green economy, Gen Zs and the work environment; populism and the future of work, and external shocks to accelerate the changing nature of work. The scan highlighted that some groups of workers may be more likely to experience conditions that contribute to vulnerability, including greater exposure to job displacement or wage depression. The future of work could also create opportunities for labor market engagement.

conclusionThe future of work represents an emerging public health concern. Exclusion from the future of work has the potential to widen existing social and health inequities. Thus, tailored supports that are resilient to changes in the nature and availability of work are required for workers facing vulnerability.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHealth InequitiesForecastingHumansSalaries and Fringe BenefitsWorkplacefuture of worklabor market exclusionsocial and health inequitiessocial determinants of healthvulnerable workerswork arrangementswork environment

Identifiers

PMID34125433
PMCPMC8362075
OpenAlexW3172078416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.