ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2021
Performance changes due to differences in training data for cerebral aneurysm detection in head MR angiography images.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Shifting the paradigm in intracranial aneurysm detection with deep learning: A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis and meta-regression.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Detection of cerebral aneurysms using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Investigation of distributed learning for automated lesion detection in head MR images.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Article
- Performance changes due to differences among annotating radiologists for training data in computerized lesion detection.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Applications for Head and Neck MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023Review
- Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in liver imaging.La Radiologia medica · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) software depends on the quality and quantity of the dataset used for machine learning. If the data characteristics in development and practical use are different, the performance of CAD software degrades. In this study, we investigated changes in detection performance due to differences in training data for cerebral aneurysm detection software in head magnetic resonance angiography images. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe utilized three types of CAD software for cerebral aneurysm detection in MRA images, which were based on 3D local intensity structure analysis, graph-based features, and convolutional neural network. For each type of CAD software, we compared three types of training pattern, which were two types of training using single-site data and one type of training using multisite data. We also carried out internal and external evaluations.
resultsIn training using single-site data, the performance of CAD software largely and unpredictably fluctuated when the training dataset was changed. Training using multisite data did not show the lowest performance among the three training patterns for any CAD software and dataset.
conclusionThe training of cerebral aneurysm detection software using data collected from multiple sites is desirable to ensure the stable performance of the software.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34125368What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.