Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34125366›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2021

Improvements in Hope, Engagement and Functioning Following a Recovery-Focused Sub-Acute Inpatient Intervention: a Six-Month Evaluation.

Tanya M Hollier, Barry G Frost, Patricia T Michie, Terry J Lewin, Ketrina A Sly

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanya M HollierSchool of Psychology, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Barry G FrostSchool of Psychology, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Patricia T MichieSchool of Psychology, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4169-8519
Terry J LewinHunter New England Mental Health Service, PO Box 833, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4510-4001
Ketrina A SlyHunter New England Mental Health Service, PO Box 833, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia. Ketrina.Sly@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5182-9893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have examined the post-discharge benefits associated with recover-oriented programs delivered in inpatient and sub-acute mental health settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term outcomes of a 6-week sub-acute inpatient intervention program for 27 service users with a diagnosis of serious mental illness (mean age = 33.22 years, 70.4% with a psychosis diagnosis). Recovery data were collected on admission, at discharge, and at 3- and 6-months post-discharge using self-report, collaborative and clinical measures. The three clinician-rated measures (assessing therapeutic engagement, functioning, and life skills) revealed linear improvements from admission to 6-month follow-up (with mean z-change ranging from 0.72 to 1.35), as did the self-reported social connection measure (Mental Health Recovery Star, MHRS; mean z-change: 1.05). There were also curvilinear improvements in self-determination and self-reported MHRS symptom management and functioning scores; however, only modest changes were detected in hope (Herth Hope Index) and MHRS self-belief scores. Change scores based on self-reported and clinician-rated measures tended to be uncorrelated. An exploration of client-level outcomes revealed three recovery trajectory subgroups: transient (21.7%), gradual (34.8%), or sustained (43.5%) improvement; with members of the latter group tending to have longer illness durations. The study's findings are encouraging, to the extent that they demonstrate recovery-focused sub-acute inpatient programs can promote clinical recovery and aspects of personal recovery. However, they also suggest that recovery perspectives differ between clients and clinicians, and that far more work is required to understand the psychological factors that generate and sustain the hope that recovery is possible.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdultAftercareHumansInpatientsPatient DischargeFunctioningHopefulnessMental health servicesPost-discharge recoveryPsychiatric rehabilitationSelf-determinationSerious mental illnessSub-acuteTherapeutic processes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.