Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34125355›Full record

ReviewClinical child and family psychology review2021

Exploring Perinatal Indicators of Infant Social-Emotional Development: A Review of the Replicated Evidence.

Jennifer E McIntosh, Craig A Olsson, Melanie Schuijers, Evelyn S Tan, Felicity Painter, Alexandra Schnabel, Genevieve LeBas, Shelby Higgs-Howarth, Michelle Benstead, Anna T Booth and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jennifer E McIntoshLa Trobe University, The Bouverie Centre, Bundoora, VIC, Australia. jenn.mcintosh@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-5003
Craig A OlssonDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Geelong, Australia.
Melanie SchuijersDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Geelong, Australia.
Evelyn S TanDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Geelong, Australia.
Felicity PainterLa Trobe University, The Bouverie Centre, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Alexandra SchnabelLa Trobe University, The Bouverie Centre, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Genevieve LeBasDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Geelong, Australia.
Shelby Higgs-HowarthAustralia National University, School of Demography, Canberra, Australia.
Michelle BensteadDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Geelong, Australia.
Anna T BoothLa Trobe University, The Bouverie Centre, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Delyse HutchinsonDeakin University, Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development, Geelong, Australia.

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council APP1175086Australian National Health and Medical Research Council APP1197488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of infant social-emotional development for outcomes across the lifecourse has been amply demonstrated. Despite this, most screening measures of social-emotional development are designed for children 18 months of age and over, with a clear gap in earlier infancy. No systematic review has yet harvested the evidence for candidate indicators in the perinatal window. This paper examines modifiable risk and protective factors for two seminal early markers of social-emotional development: attachment security and behavioral regulation mid-infancy. We searched meta-analytic and longitudinal studies of developmental relationships between modifiable exposures in the perinatal window (pregnancy to 10 months postpartum) and attachment and behavioral regulation status measured between 12 and 18 months. Six electronic databases were used: ERIC, PsycINFO, Medline Complete, Informit, Embase, and Scopus. Twelve meta-analytic reviews and 38 original studies found replicated evidence for 12 indicators across infant, caregiving, and contextual domains predictive of infant behavioral regulation and attachment status between 12 and 18 months. Key among these were caregiving responsiveness, maternal mental health, couple relationship, and SES as a contextual factor. Perinatal factors most proximal to the infant had the strongest associations with social-emotional status. Beyond very low birthweight and medical risk, evidence for infant-specific factors was weaker. Risk and protective relationships were related but not always inverse. Findings from this review have the potential to inform the development of reliable tools for early screening of infant social-emotional development for application in primary care and population health contexts.

Indexed as

EmotionsPostpartum PeriodChildChild DevelopmentFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMental HealthPregnancyDevelopmentEmotionalInfantScreeningSocial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.