Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34125292›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

The evolution of cardiac point of care ultrasound for the neonatologist.

Yogen Singh, Shazia Bhombal, Anup Katheria, Cecile Tissot, María V Fraga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Neonatal point-of-care ultrasound-guidelines for training, credentialing and quality assurance.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Detection of congenital heart disease by neonatologist performed cardiac ultrasound in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yogen SinghDepartment of Pediatrics - Neonatology and Pediatric Cardiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Box 402, NICU, Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. Yogen.Singh@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5207-9019
Shazia BhombalDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal and Behavioral Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Anup KatheriaDepartment of Neonatology, Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women & Newborns, San Diego, CA, USA.
Cecile TissotCentre de Pediatrie, Clinique des Grangettes, 7 ch des Grangettes, 1224 Chêne-Bougeries, Geneva, Switzerland.
María V FragaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USHirslanden Clinique des Grangettes · CHSharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women & Newborns · USStanford University · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly being utilized in neonatal intensive care units to provide information in real time to aid clinical decision making. While training programs and scope of practice have been well defined for other specialties, such as adult critical care and emergency medicine, there is a lack of structure for neonatal cardiac POCUS. A more comprehensive and advanced hemodynamic evaluation by a neonatologist has previously published its own clinical guidelines and specific rigorous training programs have been established to achieve competency in neonatal hemodynamics. However, it is becoming increasingly evident that access and training for basic cardiac assessment by ultrasound enhances bedside clinical care for specific indications. Recently, expert consensus POCUS guidelines for use in neonatal and pediatric intensive care endorsed by the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) have been published to guide the clinicians in using POCUS for specific indications, though the line between cardiac POCUS and advanced hemodynamic evaluation remains somewhat fluid.Conclusion: This article is focused on neonatal cardiac POCUS and its evolution, value, and limitations in the modern neonatal clinical practice. Cardiac POCUS can provide physiological and hemodynamic information in making clinical decisions while dealing with neonatal emergencies. However, it should be applied only for the specific indications and should be performed by a clinician trained in cardiac POCUS. There is an urgent need of developing cardiac POCUS curriculum and certification to support a widespread and safe use in neonates. What is Known: • International training guidelines and curriculum have been published for neonatologist-performed echocardiography (NPE) or targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE). • International evidence-based guidelines for use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in neonates and children have been recently published. What is New: • Cardiac POCUS is increasingly being incorporated in neonatal practice for emergency situations. However, one must be aware of its specific indications and limitations, especially for the neonatal clinical practice. • Cardiac POCUS and NPE/TNE are continuum of cardiac imaging with different indications and training requirements.

Indexed as

NeonatologistsPoint-of-Care SystemsChildCurriculumEchocardiographyHumansInfant, NewbornUltrasonographyBedside ultrasoundNeonatesNeonatologist-performed echocardiography (NPE)Point of care ultrasound (POCUS)Targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE)

Identifiers

PMID34125292
OpenAlexW3170033769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.