Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34125289›Full record

Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Treatment outcomes in the neovascular glaucoma tube versus trabeculectomy study.

Kana Tokumo, Kaori Komatsu, Yuki Yuasa, Yumiko Murakami, Hideaki Okumichi, Kazuyuki Hirooka, Shunsuke Nakakura, Hitoshi Tabuchi, Yoshiaki Kiuchi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kana TokumoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. kanatokumo@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5147-4829
Kaori KomatsuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Yuki YuasaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Yumiko MurakamiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Hideaki OkumichiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Kazuyuki HirookaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Shunsuke NakakuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Hyougo, Japan.
Hitoshi TabuchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Hyougo, Japan.
Yoshiaki KiuchiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
Hiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare surgical outcomes between patients who underwent Baerveldt glaucoma implantation versus trabeculectomy (TLE) for the treatment of neovascular glaucoma.

methodsWe performed a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial at Hiroshima University and Tsukazaki Hospital, Japan. Patients were randomized to Baerveldt glaucoma implantation (23 patients) or TLE (27 patients). The primary outcome measure was the rate of intraocular-pressure control. Secondary outcome measures included complications and interventions. We defined "failure" as intraocular pressure ≥ 22 mmHg or < 20% reduction from baseline pressure, on two consecutive follow-up visits; need for additional glaucoma surgery; vision-threatening complications; or loss of light perception. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine surgical success rates. Postoperative complications and interventions were compared between the two groups with Pearson Chi-square tests.

resultsThere were no significant differences in demographic or ocular characteristics between the treatment groups at baseline. The postoperative follow-up was 26.6 ± 19.4 months in the Baerveldt group and 27.3 ± 20.1 months in the TLE group. There were no statistical differences (Mann-Whitney nonparametric tests with Bonferroni correction) in postoperative intraocular pressure measured at 6-month intervals. Success rates were 59.1 and 61.6% at 1-year after Baerveldt glaucoma implantation and TLE, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in success between groups (P = 0.71, log-rank test). Medication use, visual acuity, and interventions were similar between groups. Thirteen late postoperative complications developed in the Baerveldt glaucoma implantation group and four complications developed in the TLE group. Tube exposure was the most common late complication.

conclusionThese two procedures produced similar surgical success, intraocular-pressure reductions, visual acuity, and number of medications at the last visit. The TLE group showed smaller numbers of late complications and patients who lost more than two lines of visual acuity. Therefore, TLE might be a safer and better way to treat patients with neovascular glaucoma.

Indexed as

Glaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucoma, NeovascularTrabeculectomyFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraocular PressurePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeNeovascular glaucomaRandomized controlled clinical trialTrabeculectomyTube-shunt surgery

Identifiers

PMID34125289
OpenAlexW3171226968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.