ReviewClinical chemistry2021
Cardiac Biomarkers in Pediatrics: An Undervalued Resource.
Review in Clinical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diastolic function in newborn infants: understanding pathophysiology, diagnosis and clinical relevance.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Cardiac Troponin Thresholds in Children and Young Adults: A Multi-Center Cohort Study.The journal of applied laboratory medicine · 2026Observational
- Natural language processing of biomedical text to map and prioritize protein-disease associations in HFpEF.Computers in biology and medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Systemic Ventricular Morphology on Age-Adjusted (zlog-)NT-proBNP in Children with Univentricular Hearts.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Establishing reference intervals for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in neonates and infants.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac markers in children and adolescents at the onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus.PloS one · 2026Article
- Neonatal hyperthyroidism with myocardial injury: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- The Utility of Troponin in Predicting Cardiac Dysfunction in Pediatric Patients: A Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2025Review
- Cardiac Markers in Pediatric Laboratory Medicine: Critical Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Application Value of Brain Natriuretic Peptide in the Prognostic Evaluation of Patients With Chronic Left Heart Failure.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Caspase-3 and Cardiac Troponin I in Assessing Cardiovascular Risk in Pediatric COVID-19 and Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Age- and sex-specific upper reference limits for cardiac biomarkers in Chinese children and adolescents: a prospective study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Specific reference interval for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I among healthy children in Wuhan, China.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
- Heart failure in children and adolescents: an update on diagnostic approaches and management.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024Article
- Cardiac biomarkers and left ventricular systolic function in former very preterm infants and term controls at preschool age.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Insights and perspectives into clinical biomarker discovery in pediatric heart failure and congenital heart disease-a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2023Review
- Age-specific reference values for the 5th generation cardiac troponin T assay in Chinese children.Medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical use of common cardiac biomarkers, such as brain natriuretic peptides and troponins, has traditionally been limited to adult populations in the assessment of heart failure and acute coronary syndrome, respectively. While many have discounted the value of these markers in pediatric populations, emerging evidence suggests they may be useful in the diagnosis and prognostication of many cardiac and noncardiac pathologies in neonates, children, and adolescents, and an increasing number of pediatric hospitals are routinely measuring cardiac markers in their clinical practice. CONTENT: This review summarizes and critically evaluates the current literature regarding the application of cardiac biomarkers for clinical decision-making in the pediatric population. Main potential clinical indications discussed herein include primary cardiac disease, immune-related conditions, and noncardiac disease. Important diagnostic and interpretative challenges are also described in relation to each potential indication. SUMMARY: Despite a general lack of clinical awareness regarding the value of cardiac biomarkers in pediatrics, there is increasing literature to support their application in various contexts. Cardiac biomarkers should be considered an undervalued resource in the pediatric population with potential value in the diagnosis and prognosis of myocarditis, congenital heart disease, and heart failure, as well as in the assessment of severity and cardiac involvement in immune-related and other systemic conditions. While interpretation remains challenging in pediatrics due to the age- and sex-specific dynamics occurring throughout growth and development, this should not prevent their application. Future research should focus on defining evidence-based cut-offs for specific indications using the most up-to-date assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.