Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34125147›Full record

ReviewClinical chemistry2021

Cardiac Biomarkers in Pediatrics: An Undervalued Resource.

Mary Kathryn Bohn, Shannon Steele, Alexandra Hall, Jasmin Poonia, Benjamin Jung, Khosrow Adeli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary Kathryn BohnCALIPER Program, Pediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shannon SteeleCALIPER Program, Pediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alexandra HallCALIPER Program, Pediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jasmin PooniaCALIPER Program, Pediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Benjamin JungCALIPER Program, Pediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Khosrow AdeliCALIPER Program, Pediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical use of common cardiac biomarkers, such as brain natriuretic peptides and troponins, has traditionally been limited to adult populations in the assessment of heart failure and acute coronary syndrome, respectively. While many have discounted the value of these markers in pediatric populations, emerging evidence suggests they may be useful in the diagnosis and prognostication of many cardiac and noncardiac pathologies in neonates, children, and adolescents, and an increasing number of pediatric hospitals are routinely measuring cardiac markers in their clinical practice. CONTENT: This review summarizes and critically evaluates the current literature regarding the application of cardiac biomarkers for clinical decision-making in the pediatric population. Main potential clinical indications discussed herein include primary cardiac disease, immune-related conditions, and noncardiac disease. Important diagnostic and interpretative challenges are also described in relation to each potential indication. SUMMARY: Despite a general lack of clinical awareness regarding the value of cardiac biomarkers in pediatrics, there is increasing literature to support their application in various contexts. Cardiac biomarkers should be considered an undervalued resource in the pediatric population with potential value in the diagnosis and prognosis of myocarditis, congenital heart disease, and heart failure, as well as in the assessment of severity and cardiac involvement in immune-related and other systemic conditions. While interpretation remains challenging in pediatrics due to the age- and sex-specific dynamics occurring throughout growth and development, this should not prevent their application. Future research should focus on defining evidence-based cut-offs for specific indications using the most up-to-date assays.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalPediatricsAdolescentAdultBiomarkersChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPrognosisTroponinBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainTroponinbrain natriuretic peptidecardiac troponinclinical applicationpediatric

Identifiers

PMID34125147
PMCPMC8613676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.