Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34125077›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Monitoring Diagnostic Safety Risks in Emergency Departments: Protocol for a Machine Learning Study.

Moein Enayati, Mustafa Sir, Xingyu Zhang, Sarah J Parker, Elizabeth Duffy, Hardeep Singh, Prashant Mahajan, Kalyan S Pasupathy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Moein EnayatiHealth Care Delivery Research, Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-774X
Mustafa SirAmazon Care, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-6195
Xingyu ZhangThomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8108-1997
Sarah J ParkerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6007-5803
Elizabeth DuffyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7463-5389
Hardeep SinghCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4419-8974
Prashant MahajanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-3560
Kalyan S PasupathyHealth Care Delivery Research, Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4760-2805
University of Michigan · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USAmazon (United States) · USMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Improving Diagnosis in Emergency and Acute Care: A Learning Laboratory (IDEA-LL)R18HS026622 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MAHAJAN, PRASHANT, PASUPATHY, KALYAN S · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
Application of a Machine Learning to Enhance e-Triggers to Detect and Learn from Diagnostic Safety EventsR01HS027363 · AHRQ · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SINGH, HARDEEP · 2019 to 2021
$1.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS027363AHRQ HHS R18 HS026622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnostic decision making, especially in emergency departments, is a highly complex cognitive process that involves uncertainty and susceptibility to errors. A combination of factors, including patient factors (eg, history, behaviors, complexity, and comorbidity), provider-care team factors (eg, cognitive load and information gathering and synthesis), and system factors (eg, health information technology, crowding, shift-based work, and interruptions) may contribute to diagnostic errors. Using electronic triggers to identify records of patients with certain patterns of care, such as escalation of care, has been useful to screen for diagnostic errors. Once errors are identified, sophisticated data analytics and machine learning techniques can be applied to existing electronic health record (EHR) data sets to shed light on potential risk factors influencing diagnostic decision making.

objectiveThis study aims to identify variables associated with diagnostic errors in emergency departments using large-scale EHR data and machine learning techniques.

methodsThis study plans to use trigger algorithms within EHR data repositories to generate a large data set of records that are labeled trigger-positive or trigger-negative, depending on whether they meet certain criteria. Samples from both data sets will be validated using medical record reviews, upon which we expect to find a higher number of diagnostic safety events in the trigger-positive subset. Machine learning will be used to evaluate relationships between certain patient factors, provider-care team factors, and system-level risk factors and diagnostic safety signals in the statistically matched groups of trigger-positive and trigger-negative charts.

resultsThis federally funded study was approved by the institutional review board of 2 academic medical centers with affiliated community hospitals. Trigger queries are being developed at both organizations, and sample cohorts will be labeled using the triggers. Machine learning techniques such as association rule mining, chi-square automated interaction detection, and classification and regression trees will be used to discover important variables that could be incorporated within future clinical decision support systems to help identify and reduce risks that contribute to diagnostic errors.

conclusionsThe use of large EHR data sets and machine learning to investigate risk factors (related to the patient, provider-care team, and system-level) in the diagnostic process may help create future mechanisms for monitoring diagnostic safety. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/24642.

Indexed as

diagnostic errorelectronic health recordselectronic triggersemergency departmentmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID34125077
PMCPMC8240801
OpenAlexW3155491546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.