Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34125072›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Co-designing a Lifestyle-Focused Text Message Intervention for Women After Breast Cancer Treatment: Mixed Methods Study.

Anna Singleton, Rebecca Raeside, Stephanie R Partridge, Molly Hayes, Katherine Maka, Karice K Hyun, Aravinda Thiagalingam, Clara K Chow, Kerry A Sherman, Elisabeth Elder and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Digital behaviour change interventions to increase vegetable intake in adults: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Electronic Health Interventions for Patients With Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Optimizing the impact of supportive cancer care digital health interventions: considerations for design, development, and evaluation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  13. Development of a text message intervention designed to promote safe contact lens wear.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The process of co-designing a model of social prescribing: An Australian case study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna SingletonConsumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7071-0118
Rebecca RaesideConsumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2016-6393
Stephanie R PartridgeConsumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5390-3922
Molly HayesConsumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1875-1596
Katherine MakaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8977-8235
Karice K HyunConsumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0164-7725
Aravinda ThiagalingamWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7763-7806
Clara K ChowWestmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4693-0038
Kerry A ShermanCentre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7780-6668
Elisabeth ElderWestmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6686-9898
Julie RedfernConsumer Engagement and Codesign Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8707-5563
The University of Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AUMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally. Recovery from breast cancer treatment can be mentally and physically challenging. SMS text message programs offer a novel way to provide health information and support, but few programs are co-designed with consumer representatives.

objectiveThis study aims to report the procedures and outcomes of a co-design process of a lifestyle-focused SMS text message program to support women's mental and physical health after breast cancer treatment.

methodsWe followed an iterative mixed methods two-step process: (1) co-design workshop with consumers and health professionals and researchers to draft text messages and (2) evaluation of message content, which was scored (5-point Likert scale; 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree) for ease of understanding, usefulness, and appropriateness, and readability (Flesch-Kincaid score). Additional free-text responses and semistructured interviews were coded into themes. Messages were edited or deleted based on the evaluations, with consumers' evaluations prioritized.

resultsIn step 1, co-designed text messages (N=189) were semipersonalized, and the main content themes were (1) physical activity and healthy eating, (2) medications and side effects, (3) mental health, and (4) general breast cancer information. In step 2, consumers (n=14) and health professionals and researchers (n=14) provided 870 reviews of 189 messages and found that most messages were easy to understand (799/870, 91.8%), useful (746/870, 85.7%), and appropriate (732/870, 84.1%). However, consumers rated 50 messages differently from health professionals and researchers. On the basis of evaluations, 37.6% (71/189) of messages were deleted, 36.5% (69/189) were edited, and 12 new messages related to fatigue, self-care, and cognition were created. The final 130 text messages had a mean 7.12 (SD 2.8) Flesch-Kincaid grade level and 68.9 (SD 15.5) ease-of-reading score, which represents standard reading ease.

conclusionsCo-designing and evaluating a bank of evidence-based mental and physical health-themed text messages with breast cancer survivors, health professionals, and researchers was feasible and resulted in a bank of 130 text messages evaluated highly by participants. Some consumer evaluations differed from health professionals and researchers, supporting the importance of co-design.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsText MessagingExerciseFemaleHumansLife Stylebreast neoplasmscancer survivorsco-designmobile healthtelemedicinetext messaging

Identifiers

PMID34125072
PMCPMC8240797
OpenAlexW3162003899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.