Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34124867›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2022

Policy Challenges Facing the Scale Up of Integrated Community Case Management (iCCM) in Uganda.

Phyllis Awor, Joan Nakayaga Kalyango, Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg, Freddie Ssengooba, Jaran Eriksen, Elizeus Rutebemberwa

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Phyllis AworSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-0815-5392
Joan Nakayaga KalyangoClinical Epidemiology Unit, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University Kampala, Kampala, Uganda.
Cecilia Stålsby LundborgHealth Systems and Policy, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6525-1861
Freddie SsengoobaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-3489-0745
Jaran EriksenHealth Systems and Policy, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1146-5615
Elizeus RutebemberwaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0001-8363-7928
Makerere University · UGKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrated Community Case Management (iCCM) of malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea is an equity focused strategy, to increase access to care for febrile illness in children under-5 years of age, in rural communities. Lay community members are trained to diagnose and treat malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea in children, and to identify and refer very ill children. Today, many low-income countries including Uganda, have a policy for iCCM which is being rolled out through public sector community health workers (CHWs). Ten years after the introduction of the iCCM strategy in Uganda, it is important to take stock and understand the barriers and facilitators affecting implementation of the iCCM policy.

methodsWe conducted an iCCM policy analysis in order to identify the challenges, enablers and priorities for scale-up of the iCCM strategy in Uganda. This was a qualitative case study research which included a document review (n=52) and key informant interviews (n=15) with Ugandan stakeholders. Interviews were conducted in 2017 and the desk review included literature up to 2019.

resultsThis paper highlights the iCCM policy trajectory since 2010 in Uganda and includes a policy timeline. The iCCM policy process was mainly led by international agencies from inception, with little ownership of the government. Many implementation challenges including low government funding, weak coordination and contradicting policies were identified, which could contribute to the slow scale up of the iCCM program. Despite the challenges, many enablers and opportunities also exist within the health system, which should be further harnessed to scale up iCCM in Uganda. These enabling factors include strong community commitment, existing policy instruments and the potential of utilizing also the private sector for iCCM implementation.

conclusionThe iCCM program in Uganda needs to be strengthen through increased domestic funding, strong coordination and a focus on monitoring, evaluation and operational research.

Indexed as

MalariaPneumoniaCase ManagementChildDiarrheaHumansPolicyUgandaCommunity Case managementDiarrhoeaiCCM Policy AnalysisMalariaPneumoniaUganda

Identifiers

PMID34124867
PMCPMC9808347
OpenAlexW3171685668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.