Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34124866›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of health policy and management2021

Ultra-Processed Profits: The Political Economy of Countering the Global Spread of Ultra-Processed Foods - A Synthesis Review on the Market and Political Practices of Transnational Food Corporations and Strategic Public Health Responses.

Rob Moodie, Elizabeth Bennett, Edwin Jit Leung Kwong, Thiago M Santos, Liza Pratiwi, Joanna Williams, Phillip Baker

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of health policy and management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Rethinking fussiness in commercial food contexts.Health promotion international · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Mapping the Healthiness of Community Food Environments and Their Association With the Socioeconomic Index for Areas (SEIFA) in the South Coast of NSW.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rob MoodieMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8425-7975
Elizabeth BennettCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7357-2278
Edwin Jit Leung KwongMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6225-9841
Thiago M SantosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4572-5297
Liza PratiwiIndonesian Adolescent Health Association, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-9250-7252
Joanna WilliamsMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1472-6227
Phillip BakerInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0802-2349
The University of Melbourne · AUDeakin University · AUIndonesian Pediatric Society · IDJames Cook University · AUUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltra-processed food (UPF) and Ultra-processed beverage (UPB) consumption is associated with higher risks of numerous non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Yet global consumption of these products is rising due to profound changes in production, processing, manufacturing, marketing, retail, and consumption practices, alongside the growth of the resources and political influence of Big Food. Whilst the sales of UPFs and UPBs in high-income countries (HICs) are stagnating, sales are rapidly expanding in more populous middle-income countries (MICs). In this paper, we adopt a political economy of food systems approach to understand how growth of Big Food in MICs drives the NCD pandemic.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods synthesis review. This involved quantitative data collection and development of descriptive statistics; a search for academic, market and grey literature on the expansion of UPF in MICs; and the development of themes, three illustrative case examples (South Africa, Colombia, and Indonesia), and synthesis of the enablers of successful campaigns in MICs into recommendations for public health campaigns.

resultsWe project that the combined sales volume of UPFs in MICs will reach equivalency with HICs by 2024, and the total sales volume of UPBs in MICs is already significantly higher than in HICs. Similarly, annual growth in UPF sales is higher in MICs compared to HICs. We also show how Big Food has entrenched its presence within MICs through establishing global production and hyper-local distribution networks, scaling up its marketing, challenging government policies and scientific expertise, and co-opting civil society. We argue that public health can counter the influence of Big Food by developing an expanded global network of driven and passionate people with diverse skillsets, and advocating for increased government leadership.

conclusionThe projected increase in sales of UPFs and UPBs in MICs raises major concerns about the global capacity to prevent and treat NCDs.

Indexed as

Noncommunicable DiseasesPublic HealthCommerceFast FoodsHumansOrganizationsAdvocacyCorporate PowerCorporationsSugar-Sweetened BeveragesUltra-Processed Foods

Identifiers

PMID34124866
PMCPMC9309965
OpenAlexW3170371071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.