Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34124862›Full record

Observational studyCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

Prognostic impact of resistance to bortezomib and/or lenalidomide in carfilzomib-based therapies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: The Kyoto Clinical Hematology Study Group, multicenter, pilot, prospective, observational study in Asian patients.

Yuka Kawaji-Kanayama, Tsutomu Kobayashi, Ayako Muramatsu, Hitoji Uchiyama, Nana Sasaki, Nobuhiko Uoshima, Mitsushige Nakao, Ryoichi Takahashi, Kazuho Shimura, Hiroto Kaneko and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuka Kawaji-KanayamaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tsutomu KobayashiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5600-5762
Ayako MuramatsuDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hitoji UchiyamaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Nana SasakiDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Nobuhiko UoshimaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Mitsushige NakaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Otsu Municipal Hospital, Otsu, Japan.
Ryoichi TakahashiDepartment of Hematology, Omihachiman Community Medical Center, Omihachiman, Japan.
Kazuho ShimuraDepartment of Hematology, Aiseikai Yamashina Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroto KanekoDepartment of Hematology, Aiseikai Yamashina Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Miki KiyotaDepartment of Hematology, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Moriguchi, Japan.
Katsuya WadaDepartment of Hematology, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Moriguchi, Japan.
Yoshiaki ChinenDepartment of Hematology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Fukuchiyama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8966-2876
Koichi HirakawaDepartment of Hematology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Fukuchiyama, Japan.
Shin-Ichi FuchidaDepartment of Hematology, Japan Community Health care Organization, Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Chihiro ShimazakiDepartment of Hematology, Japan Community Health care Organization, Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Yayoi Matsumura-KimotoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Shinsuke MizutaniDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Taku TsukamotoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuji ShimuraDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Shigeo HoriikeDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Masafumi TaniwakiDepartment of Hematology, Aiseikai Yamashina Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Junya KurodaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6130-1550
Kyoto Clinical Hematology Study Group (KOTOSG) Investigators
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPFukuyama City Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPMatsushita Memorial Hospital · JPSaiseikai Ibaraki Hospital · JPCommunity Medical Center · USKyoto first Red Cross hospital · JPOtsu Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombinatory strategies with carfilzomib (CFZ), a second-generation proteasome inhibitor, plus dexamethasone (DEX) with or without lenalidomide (LEN) have shown promising efficacy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in pivotal clinical trials. However, their effects on patients who were resistance to bortezomib (BTZ) and/or LEN have not been fully evaluated in a daily practice setting.

aimsTo evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of CFZ-based treatments; that is, CFZ with LEN plus DEX (KRD therapy) and CFZ with DEX (KD therapy), in Asian patients, we conducted a multicenter pilot prospective observational study in the Kyoto Clinical Hematology Study Group. METHODS AND

resultsAll 50 patients with RRMM enrolled in this study were treated with CFZ-based treatments between 2017 and 2019. KRD and KD were administered to 31 and 19 patients, respectively. The overall response rates (ORRs) were 80.6% with KRD and 73.7% with KD. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 58.5% and 79.7% with KRD, and 23.1% and 52.6% with KD. By multivariate analysis, refractoriness to BTZ and to LEN were identified as independent unfavorable factors for both PFS and OS. The common non-hematologic AEs included hypertension (42.0%), fever (24.0%), fatigue (24.0%), and infection (16.0%). No serious heart failure was observed. This study is registered as UMIN000025108.

conclusionThis study suggests the need of the development of novel CFZ-containing strategy which can overcome the refractoriness to BTZ and/or LEN, while both KRD and KD were shown to be mostly feasible in Asian patients in a daily practice setting.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBortezomibFemaleHumansJapanLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaOligopeptidesPilot ProjectsPrognosisBortezomibcarfilzomibLenalidomideOligopeptidesbortezomibcarfilzomiblenalidomidemultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID34124862
PMCPMC8842705
OpenAlexW3168048827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.