Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34124685›Full record

ArticleACS applied polymer materials2020

Degrafting of Polymer Brushes by Exposure to Humid Air.

Maria Brió Pérez, Marco Cirelli, Sissi de Beer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied polymer materials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Swelling and Degrafting of Poly(3-sulfopropyl methacrylate) Brushes.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024
    Article
  9. On the Road to Circular Polymer Brushes: Challenges and Prospects.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Swelling-Activated, Soft Mechanochemistry in Polymer Materials.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Vapor Swelling of Polymer Brushes Compared to Nongrafted Films.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Brió PérezMaterials Science and Technology of Polymers, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6328-9556
Marco CirelliMaterials Science and Technology of Polymers, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7176-0566
Sissi de BeerMaterials Science and Technology of Polymers, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7208-6814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well-known that polymer brushes can degraft in aqueous liquids. Here we show that brushes can deteriorate in humid air too. We observe that the detachment rate of the brushes increases with increasing relative humidity and hydrophilicity of the brushes. We relate this to the increase in water absorption as these parameters are increased. Our results imply that protective measures that are at present being developed for applications of brushes in liquids will also be key in enabling the long-term storage and utilization of hydrophilic brushes in air.

Identifiers

PMID34124685
PMCPMC8192051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.