Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34124654›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2021

Nationwide Subjective and Objective Assessments of Potential Talent Predictors in Elite Youth Soccer: An Investigation of Prognostic Validity in a Prospective Study.

Oliver Höner, Dennis Murr, Paul Larkin, Robert Schreiner, Daniel Leyhr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Testing in Football: A Narrative Review.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Age and Maturation Matter in Youth Elite Soccer, but Depending on Competitive Level and Gender.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver HönerInstitute of Sports Science, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Dennis MurrInstitute of Sports Science, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Paul LarkinInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Robert SchreinerInstitute of Sports Science, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Daniel LeyhrInstitute of Sports Science, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEVictoria University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have provided empirical evidence on the prognostic relevance of objective performance diagnostics in the soccer talent identification and development process. However, little is known about the prognostic validity of coaches' subjective evaluations of performance. This study evaluated objective and subjective assessments within a nationwide talent development program and addressed motor, perceptual skill, and personality-related performance factors. Male players (

Indexed as

coach's eyefootballmultidimensional diagnosticphysiological abilitiespsychosocial skillstactical skillstalent identification and developmenttechnical skills

Identifiers

PMID34124654
PMCPMC8193982
OpenAlexW3166919951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.