Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34124577›Full record

ReviewNanoscale advances2021

Biomolecular interactions of ultrasmall metallic nanoparticles and nanoclusters.

Alioscka A Sousa, Peter Schuck, Sergio A Hassan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanoscale advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. An automated interface for sedimentation velocity analysis in SEDFIT.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaluation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alioscka A SousaDepartment of Biochemistry, Federal University of São Paulo São Paulo SP 04044 Brazil alioscka.sousa@unifesp.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7443-5363
Peter SchuckNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, NIH Bethesda MD 20892 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8859-6966
Sergio A HassanBCBB, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH Bethesda MD 20892 USA hassan@mail.nih.gov.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-078X

Funding

Dynamics of Protein Assemblies by Analytical UltracentrifugationZIAEB000051 · NIBIB · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING · PI SCHUCK, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$7.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of nanoparticles (NPs) in biomedicine has made a gradual transition from proof-of-concept to clinical applications, with several NP types meeting regulatory approval or undergoing clinical trials. A new type of metallic nanostructures called ultrasmall nanoparticles (usNPs) and nanoclusters (NCs), while retaining essential properties of the larger (classical) NPs, have features common to bioactive proteins. This combination expands the potential use of usNPs and NCs to areas of diagnosis and therapy traditionally reserved for small-molecule medicine. Their distinctive physicochemical properties can lead to unique

Identifiers

PMID34124577
PMCPMC8168927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.