ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2021
An Advanced Communication Skills Workshop Using Standardized Patients for Senior Medical Students.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI- vs Human-Based Assessment of Medical Interview Transcripts in a Generative AI-Simulated Patient System: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Anger De-escalation: A Standardized Patient Workshop for Third- and Fourth-Year Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
- Communication skills as a bridge between medical and public health education: the case of Greek medical students.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Psychometric validation of the informed consent assessment scale using item response theory and factor analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Integration of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine Into a Medical Student Clinical Reasoning Curriculum.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
- Values and Uncertainty at End of Life: A Standardized Patient Case for Preclinical Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025Article
- Video tools in pediatric goals of care communication: A systematic review.PEC innovation · 2022Review
- Medical students' experiences of working with simulated patients in challenging communication training.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2022Article
- I Don't Have a Diagnosis for You: Preparing Medical Students to Communicate Diagnostic Uncertainty in the Emergency Department.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022Article
- A Comparison Between In-Person and Virtual Communication Skills OSCE for Medical Students.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Explicit Training in Systematic Communication Strategies: A Pilot Study Exploring the Incorporation of Communication Tools by First-Year Residents in Simulation and in Clinical Practice.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- Comparison of a Virtual and in-Person OSCE on Advanced Communication Skills: Qualitative Insights from Medical Student Debrief Transcripts.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Medical students often lack training in advanced communication skills encompassing emotionally fraught situations and those in which an intense emotional response is expected. Such skills are required for clinical situations encountered during residency. We created and evaluated an advanced communication skills workshop (ACSW) using standardized patients for senior medical students. The workshop emphasized communication skills for four scenarios-strong emotion, goals of care, medical error, and palliative care assessment-and utilized formative peer assessment and feedback. Methods: We created the four ACSW cases with case-specific communication behavior checklists and a common modified Master Interview Rating Scale in a Capstone Course for senior medical students. In groups of three, students rotated through three of four stations. Each student conducted one of the interviews while the other two completed the checklists and provided verbal feedback. We performed one-way analyses of variance on Likert responses and content analysis on open responses on a post-ACSW survey. Results: Ninety-one students completed the ACSW and survey. Students assigned high value to all four ACSW student roles: interviewer, observer, feedback recipient, and feedback provider. Students rated the experience above average to excellent on nearly all survey items. Open-response themes included "liked the opportunity to give or receive peer feedback" (46%) and "found the checklists helpful" (45%). Discussion: Feasible and well received by senior medical students, our ACSW offers an opportunity to practice and observe advanced communication skills and peer feedback. A peer-assisted, formative learning model, the ACSW efficiently addresses a key aspect of residency preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.