Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34124336›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Effects of pre-analytical procedures on blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's pathophysiology, glial activation, and neurodegeneration.

Nicholas J Ashton, Marc Suárez-Calvet, Thomas K Karikari, Juan Lantero-Rodriguez, Anniina Snellman, Mathias Sauer, Joel Simrén, Carolina Minguillon, Karine Fauria, Kaj Blennow and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicholas J AshtonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Marc Suárez-CalvetPasqual Maragall Foundation Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC) Barcelona Spain.
Thomas K KarikariDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Juan Lantero-RodriguezDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Anniina SnellmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Mathias SauerClinical Neurochemistry Laboratory Sahlgrenska University Hospital Mölndal Sweden.
Joel SimrénDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Carolina MinguillonPasqual Maragall Foundation Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC) Barcelona Spain.
Karine FauriaPasqual Maragall Foundation Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC) Barcelona Spain.
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEBarcelonaβeta Brain Research Center · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable · ESMunicipal Institute for Medical Research · ESUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

The effects of iron on oxidative stress and Alzheimer's biomarkers in amyloid-positive and negative elderly normalR01AG068398 · NIA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CHIANG, GLORIA CHIA-YI · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe tested how tube types (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA], serum, lithium heparin [LiHep], and citrate) and freeze-thaw cycles affect levels of blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology, glial activation, and neuronal injury.

methodsAmyloid beta (Aβ)42, Aβ40, phosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181), glial fibrillary acidic protein, total tau (t-tau), neurofilament light, and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy protein were measured using single molecule arrays.

resultsLiHep demonstrated the highest mean value for all biomarkers. Tube types were highly correlated for most biomarkers (r > 0.95) but gave significantly different absolute concentrations. Weaker correlations between tube types were found for Aβ42/40 (r = 0.63-0.86) and serum t-tau (r = 0.46-0.64). Freeze-thaw cycles highly influenced levels of serum Aβ and t-tau ( DISCUSSION: The same tube type should be used in research studies on blood biomarkers. Individual concentration cut-offs are needed for each tube type in all tested biomarkers despite being highly correlated. Serum should be avoided for Aβ42, Aβ40, and t-tau. Freeze-thaw cycles > 3 should be avoided for p-tau181.

Indexed as

amyloid betabiomarkersbloodcitrateethylenediaminetetraacetic acidglial fibrillary acidic proteinlithium heparinneurofilament lightphosphorylated taupre‐analyticsserum

Identifiers

PMID34124336
PMCPMC8171159
OpenAlexW3170010058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.