Trial reportBioMed research international2021
Titanium and Other Metal Hypersensitivity Diagnosed by MELISA® Test: Follow-Up Study.
Trial report in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Titanium: An Unusual Allergen With Various Presentations-A Retrospective Cohort Study.Contact dermatitis · 2025Article
- The Nallan-Nickel Effect: A Mechanistic Perspective on Burning Sensations and Lichenoid Reactions in Long-Serving Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Restorations.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Allergic reaction to hypoglossal nerve stimulator: a case report.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Article
- Patient Centricity-An Empirical Research on Titanium Dental Implants and Their Adverse Effects on Health Condition.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Metal hypersensitivity in hip, knee and spine surgery.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2023Review
- Review
- Minimization of Adverse Effects Associated with Dental Alloys.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Delayed Metal Hypersensitivity from Surgical Clips Causing Progressive Neuropathy.CRSLS : MIS case reports from SLSArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study is aimed at proving the clinical benefit of the MELISA® test in the minimization or complete elimination of health problems in patients with confirmed hypersensitivity to metals used for tissue replacements. A group of 305 patients aged 20-75 years with previously proven metal hypersensitivity (initial MELISA® test), mainly to titanium and then to another fifteen metals, was chosen from the database at the Institute of Dental Medicine. From these patients, a final group of 42 patients agreed to participate in the study, 35 of which were female and 7 were male. The patients completed a special questionnaire aimed at information regarding change of health status from their last visit and determining whether the results of the initial MELISA® test and recommendations based on it were beneficial for patients or not. They were clinically examined, and peripheral blood samples were taken to perform follow-up MELISA® tests. Questionnaire data was processed, and the follow-up MELISA® test results were compared with the results of the initial MELISA® tests. For statistical analysis, the Fisher's exact test and paired
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.