Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34123925›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of medical ethics among health practitioners in Taif government, KSA.

Mutaz H Althobaiti, Lama H Alkhaldi, Waad D Alotaibi, Maha N Alshreef, Asalah H Alkhaldi, Nejoud F Alshreef, Nawaf N Alzahrani, Ayman A Atalla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mutaz H AlthobaitiCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Lama H AlkhaldiCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Waad D AlotaibiCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Maha N AlshreefCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Asalah H AlkhaldiCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Nejoud F AlshreefCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Nawaf N AlzahraniCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ayman A AtallaCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Taif University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMedical ethics practice and the attitude and knowledge toward it was our concern and aim to investigate.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 1943 healthcare practitioners from three tertiary care hospitals. A questionnaire requesting demographic data and items related to the level of knowledge and awareness beside the real-life practice of medical ethics among healthcare providers was used. A score was given for each response and a total score was calculated.

resultsOf the participants, 86.9% had studied medical ethics, 70.3% thought patients should know about their rights, 87.4% supported that the patient have the right to know and be informed if any malpractice happened, 61.8% never engaged in healthcare-related act on a patient without informed consent, 73% ensured that no one was present other than medical team during assessments or procedures, and 86.6% tried to give only what was necessary to the patient regarding their situation. Nursing specialists/technicians, with of 20-<30 years of practice and participants who had previous training in bioethics had significantly higher mean attitude scores than others. Females, laboratory specialists/technicians, and those who reported previous study of medical ethics had a significantly higher practice scores. A cogent positive correlation was found between the practice and attitude scores.

conclusionInterduce medical ethics and insist on its importance in medical institutions will positively affect practitioners' knowledge, attitude, and practice.

Indexed as

Ethics practiceknowledgemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34123925
PMCPMC8144760
OpenAlexW3159148413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.