Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34123846›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2021

Tissue-Based Biomarkers for the Risk Stratification of Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Spyridon P Basourakos, Michael Tzeng, Patrick J Lewicki, Krishnan Patel, Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh, Siv Venkat, Jonathan E Shoag, Michael A Gorin, Christopher E Barbieri, Jim C Hu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of the Relationship between CD44 Expression and Gleason Grade among Prostate Adenocarcinoma and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Prostate cancer biomarkers: from early diagnosis to precision treatment.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Artificial Intelligence-Based PTEN Loss Assessment as an Early Predictor of Prostate Cancer Metastasis After Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Identification of a 24-gene panel and a novel marker ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Spyridon P BasourakosDepartment of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Michael TzengDepartment of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Patrick J LewickiDepartment of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Krishnan PatelRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Bashir Al Hussein Al AwamlhDepartment of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Siv VenkatDepartment of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Jonathan E ShoagDepartment of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Michael A GorinDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburg School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Christopher E BarbieriDepartment of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Jim C HuDepartment of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
New York Hospital Queens · USWeill Cornell Medicine · USCornell University · USNational Cancer Institute · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USPittsburg State University · USUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk stratification of men with clinically localized prostate cancer has historically relied on basic clinicopathologic parameters such as prostate specific antigen level, grade group, and clinical stage. However, prostate cancer often behaves in ways that cannot be accurately predicted by these parameters. Thus, recent efforts have focused on developing tissue-based genomic tests that provide greater insights into the risk of a given patient's disease. Multiple tests are now commercially available and provide additional prognostic information at various stages of the care pathway for prostate cancer. Indeed, early evidence suggests that these assays may have a significant impact on patient and physician decision-making. However, the impact of these tests on oncologic outcomes remains less clear. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the use of tissue-based biomarkers in the treatment of prostate cancer and identify the existing evidence supporting their clinical use.

Indexed as

decision makinggenetic markerprognosisprostate cancertissue biomarker

Identifiers

PMID34123846
PMCPMC8193839
OpenAlexW3166018837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.