ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Study of an Online Plan Verification Method and the Sensitivity of Plan Delivery Accuracy to Different Beam Parameter Errors in Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A practical framework for routine verification of Spot Position Monitor coordinate consistency in scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and validation of NTCP models for predicting acute esophagitis in carbon ion radiotherapy for thoracic malignancies.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Clinical Viability of an Active Spot Scanning Beam Delivery System With a Newly Developed Carbon-Ion Treatment Planning System.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Online adaptive planning methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Review
- Three-dimensional Patient-specific Quality Assurance Using Beam Delivery Log Data for Pencil Beam Scanning Carbon-ion Radiotherapy.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For scanning beam particle therapy, the plan delivery accuracy is affected by spot size deviation, position deviation and particle number deviation. Until now, all plan verification systems available for particle therapy have been designed for pretreatment verification. The purpose of this study is to introduce a method for online plan delivery accuracy checks and to evaluate the sensitivity of plan delivery accuracy to different beam parameter errors. A program was developed using MATLAB to reconstruct doses from beam parameters recorded in log files and to compare them with the doses calculated by treatment planning system (TPS). Both carbon ion plans and proton plans were evaluated in this study. The dose reconstruction algorithm is verified by comparing the dose from the TPS with the reconstructed dose under the same beam parameters. The sensitivity of plan delivery accuracy to different beam parameter errors was analyzed by comparing the dose reconstructed from the pseudo plans that manually added errors with the original plan dose. For the validation of dose reconstruction algorithm, mean dose difference between the reconstructed dose and the plan dose were 0.70% ± 0.24% and 0.51% ± 0.25% for carbon ion beam and proton beam, respectively. According to our simulation, the delivery accuracy of the carbon ion plan is more sensitive to spot position deviation and particle number deviation, and the delivery accuracy of the proton plan is more sensitive to spot size deviation. To achieve a 90% gamma pass rate with 3 mm/3% criteria, the average spot size deviation, position deviation, particle number deviation should be within 23%, 1.9 mm, and 1.5% and 20%, 2.1 mm, and 1.6% for carbon ion beam and proton beam, respectively. In conclusion, the method that we introduced for online plan delivery verification is feasible and reliable. The sensitivity of plan delivery accuracy to different errors was clarified for our system. The methods used in this study can be easily repeated in other particle therapy centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.