ArticleRestorative dentistry & endodontics2021
Biological assessment of a new ready-to-use hydraulic sealer.
Article in Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and radiographic assessment of mineral trioxide aggregate with platelet rich fibrin as pulp capping biomaterials: a 12-month randomized trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility and bioactivity of bioceramic repair materials.Brazilian oral research · 2026Article
- Biocompatibility and bioactivity of bioceramic endodontic sealer: NeoSealer Flo.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2025Article
- Tissue response and expression of interleukins (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-10 after pulp capping with bioglasses in mice.Brazilian oral research · 2024Article
- Biological Properties of Bioceramic Sealers on Osteoblastic Cells: A Comparative Study.Brazilian dental journal · 2024Article
- AnBioinformation · 2024Article
- In vivo cytotoxicity analysis of bioceramic root canal sealers on zebrafish embryo.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2023Article
- Biological investigation of resinous endodontic sealers containing calcium hydroxide.PloS one · 2023Article
- Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of bioceramic and epoxy sealers after using various final irrigants: AnJournal of conservative dentistry : JCDArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study compared the cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, and tenascin immunolabeling of a new ready-to-use hydraulic sealer (Bio-C Sealer) with MTA-Fillapex and white MTA-Angelus. MATERIALS AND
methodsL929 fibroblasts were cultivated and exposed to undiluted and diluted material extracts. Polyethylene tubes with or without (the control) the materials were implanted into the dorsa of rats. At 7 days and 30 days, the rats were euthanized, and the specimens were prepared for analysis; inflammation and immunolabeling were measured, and statistical analysis was performed (
resultsMTA-Fillapex exhibited greater cytotoxicity than the other materials at all time points (
conclusionsBio-C Sealer and white MTA-Angelus exhibited greater cytocompatibility than MTA-Fillapex; all materials displayed adequate biocompatibility and induced tenascin immunolabeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.