ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021
Serial Excision for Treatment of Non-melanoma Skin Cancer.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unraveling Skin Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Examination of Diagnosis, Treatment Strategies, and Emerging Therapeutic Avenues in Skin Cancer Management.Pharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2025Review
- Advancements in skin cancer treatment: focus on photodynamic therapy: a review.American journal of cancer research · 2024Review
- Advancements in nanoparticle-based treatment approaches for skin cancer therapy.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has become the predominant modality of excision for non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Patients are referred for MMS under the assumption that it is the most effective procedure for definitive removal of the cancer while also allowing for maximal tissue preservation to achieve optimal cosmesis. The objective of this study was to investigate outcomes of serial excision (SE) as an alternative excision modality for NMSC.
methodsPatients undergoing SE for basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma by the senior author from 2009 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, lesion characteristics, and excision characteristics were recorded. The primary outcome was the number of excisions required to achieve negative margins.
resultsIn total, 129 patients with 205 NMSC lesions were retrospectively reviewed. An estimated 69 lesions (33.7%) were located in high risk areas, as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Negative margins were achieved in 191 (93.2%) lesions. In 88.3% of lesions (n = 181/205), negative margins were achieved in 2 or less excisions. 12 lesions (5.9%) were referred for MMS.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that SE is an effective modality for definitive removal of NMSC. Recent research reveals that SE is much less expensive than MMS, and therefore places a smaller financial burden on the patient and the healthcare system as a whole. Relative to MMS, SE offers similar if not increased benefits for lower cost. Our findings highlight the need to critically reassess the select indications for MMS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.