Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34123579›Full record

ReviewCurrent surgery reports2021

The Age of Artificial Intelligence: Use of Digital Technology in Clinical Nutrition.

Berkeley N Limketkai, Kasuen Mauldin, Natalie Manitius, Laleh Jalilian, Bradley R Salonen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current surgery reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06988501 (The Effect of Goal Setting With Mobile-based Self-management Tool on Improving Diet Quality of People With High Blood Pressure), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06988501 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Goal Setting With Mobile-based Self-management Tool on Improving Diet Quality of People With High Blood Pressure: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChina National Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesRan2024 to 2025Enrolled110ConditionsBlood Pressure, HighArmsGoal setting with mobile-based self-management tool, Nutrition education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Berkeley N LimketkaiVatche & Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, UCLA School of Medicine, 100 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite 345, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
Kasuen MauldinDepartment of Nutrition, Food Science, and Packaging, San José State University, San José, CA USA.
Natalie ManitiusVatche & Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, UCLA School of Medicine, 100 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite 345, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
Laleh JalilianDepartment of Anesthesiology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Bradley R SalonenDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewComputing advances over the decades have catalyzed the pervasive integration of digital technology in the medical industry, now followed by similar applications for clinical nutrition. This review discusses the implementation of such technologies for nutrition, ranging from the use of mobile apps and wearable technologies to the development of decision support tools for parenteral nutrition and use of telehealth for remote assessment of nutrition. RECENT

findingsMobile applications and wearable technologies have provided opportunities for real-time collection of granular nutrition-related data. Machine learning has allowed for more complex analyses of the increasing volume of data collected. The combination of these tools has also translated into practical clinical applications, such as decision support tools, risk prediction, and diet optimization. SUMMARY: The state of digital technology for clinical nutrition is still young, although there is much promise for growth and disruption in the future.

Indexed as

Digital healthEnteral nutritionMachine learningNutritionParenteral nutritionWearables

Identifiers

PMID34123579
PMCPMC8186363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.