Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34123550›Full record

ArticleJBJS essential surgical techniques

The Double DAIR: A 2-Stage Debridement with Prosthesis-Retention Protocol for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Kade S McQuivey, Joshua Bingham, Andrew Chung, Henry Clarke, Adam Schwartz, Jordan R Pollock, Christopher Beauchamp, Mark J Spangehl

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBJS essential surgical techniques. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Current Clinical Challenges.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Redo DAIR: The Game Is Seldom Worth the Candle.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kade S McQuiveyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Joshua BinghamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Andrew ChungDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Henry ClarkeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Adam SchwartzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Jordan R PollockDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Christopher BeauchampDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Mark J SpangehlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Mayo Clinic Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDebridement and implant retention (DAIR) has variable success as a treatment for acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), with generally poor outcomes reported in the literature DESCRIPTION: Following exposure of the joint, cultures are obtained, and all modular components are removed, scrubbed, and soaked in an antiseptic solution. A thorough irrigation and debridement with complete synovectomy is performed, followed by temporary reinsertion of the original modular parts. High-dose antibiotic cement beads are inserted into the joint, and the joint is closed. Approximately 5 to 6 days later, a second debridement is performed, the beads are removed, and the new modular, sterile components are implanted. The patient is placed on a course of intravenous and, later, oral antibiotics, in addition to a standard postoperative rehabilitation protocol. ALTERNATIVES: Long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy.One-stage DAIR.One-stage exchange arthroplasty.Two-stage exchange arthroplasty.Resection arthroplasty.Amputation. RATIONALE: The treatment of acute PJI has historically consisted of a single irrigation and debridement, with exchange of modular parts and retention of the components, followed by intravenous antibiotic therapy. Despite having lower rates of patient morbidity compared with a 2-stage exchange arthroplasty, this more traditional procedure also has a higher rate of failure, with reported rates as high as 60% to 84% EXPECTED OUTCOMES: The success rate for the double-DAIR procedure has been reproducible, with infection-control rates of 87% and 90% reported in 2 studies from a single cohort at our institution IMPORTANT TIPS: Thorough debridement is key to successful infection control of infection.Antibiotic-loaded bone cement has repeatedly been demonstrated to be safe, and we recommend its use

Identifiers

PMID34123550
PMCPMC8189597
OpenAlexW3130716728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.