Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34123397›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2021

The impact of the novel coronavirus movement restrictions in the United Kingdom on food outlet usage and body mass index.

Ahmad Albalawi, Catherine Hambly, John R Speakman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmad AlbalawiSchool of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9551-3965
Catherine HamblySchool of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.
John R SpeakmanSchool of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2457-1823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany countries have implemented various levels of lockdown to mitigate the spread of the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In the United Kingdom, the national lockdown restrictions were implemented between 26 March 2020 and 4 July 2020. These restrictions required all restaurants to close except for takeaway and delivery services. Moreover, individuals were instructed to largely stay in their homes, unless they were identified as essential workers, and to only leave home once per day for exercise. These restrictions might have an impact on energy intake and expenditure, thereby affecting their body weight.

aimsThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the movement restrictions in the United Kingdom on food outlet usage and body mass index (BMI). MATERIALS AND

methodsFood outlet usage surveys were filled out for 7 consecutive days before and during the lockdown. Changes in BMI and food outlet usage before and during the lockdown were measured. A total of 206 participants were included in this study.

resultsThe mean overall BMI prior to lockdown was 25.8 ± 5.2 kg·m DISCUSSION: Despite the large changes in behavior, there was no overall adverse effect of the lockdown with respect to obesity levels.

conclusionLockdown in the United Kingdom modified restaurant use but had no effect on obesity levels.

Indexed as

COVID‐19lockdownobesityphysical activitytakeaway and delivery intake

Identifiers

PMID34123397
PMCPMC8170584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.