ArticleChemical science2020
Data-powered augmented volcano plots for homogeneous catalysis.
Article in Chemical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI Approaches to Homogeneous Catalysis with Transition Metal Complexes.ACS catalysis · 2025Review
- SPOCK Tool for Constructing Empirical Volcano Diagrams from Catalytic Data.ACS catalysis · 2025Article
- Microkinetic Molecular Volcano Plots for Enhanced Catalyst Selectivity and Activity Predictions.ACS catalysis · 2024Article
- Bridging Chemical Knowledge and Machine Learning for Performance Prediction of Organic Synthesis.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2023Review
- Constructing and interpreting volcano plots and activity maps to navigate homogeneous catalyst landscapes.Nature protocols · 2022Review
- Mapping Catalyst-Solvent Interplay in Competing Carboamination/Cyclopropanation Reactions.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022Article
- A reactivity model for oxidative addition to palladium enables quantitative predictions for catalytic cross-coupling reactions.Chemical science · 2022Article
- Uncovering the Activity of Alkaline Earth Metal Hydrogenation Catalysis Through Molecular Volcano Plots.Topics in catalysis · 2022Article
- Reaction-based machine learning representations for predicting the enantioselectivity of organocatalysts.Chemical science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the computational resources available today, data-driven approaches can propel the next leap forward in catalyst design. Using a data-driven inspired workflow consisting of data generation, statistical analysis, and dimensionality reduction algorithms we explore trends surrounding the thermodynamics of a model hydroformylation reaction catalyzed by group 9 metals bearing phosphine ligands. Specifically, we introduce "augmented volcano plots" as a means to easily visualize the similarity of each catalyst's complete catalytic cycle energy profile to that of a hypothetical ideal reference profile without relying upon linear scaling relationships. In addition to quickly identifying catalysts that most closely match the ideal thermodynamic catalytic cycle energy profile, these maps also enable a more refined comparison of closely lying species in standard volcano plots. For the reaction studied here, they inherently uncover the presence of multiple sets of scaling relationships differentiated by metal type, where iridium catalysts follow distinct relationships from cobalt/rhodium catalysts and have profiles that more closely match the ideal thermodynamic profile. Reconstituted molecular volcano plots confirm the findings of the augmented volcanoes by showing that hydroformylation thermodynamics are governed by two distinct volcano shapes, one for iridium catalysts and a second for cobalt/rhodium species.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.