ReviewChemical science2020
The double life of conductive nanopipette: a nanopore and an electrochemical nanosensor.
Review in Chemical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanoelectroanalysis with Carbon Nanopipettes Based on Prussian Blue-NiHCF for Hydrogen Peroxide Sensing.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Scan-Rate-Induced Transition from Redox to Ion Current Rectification in Carbon Nanopipettes.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Single-Particle Analysis of Cargo-Dependent Deformation in Lipid Nanoparticles Using Resistive Pulse Sensing: Implications for Formulation Optimization and Quality Control of mRNA Nanomedicine.ACS applied nano materials · 2026Article
- Fundamental Insights into Nanoconfined Devices by Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Thin-Layer Behavior in Carbon Nanopipettes. Understanding the Iontronic-Electronic Contributions.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Nanopore-Based Neurotransmitter Detection: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.ACS nano · 2025Review
- Nanopipette dynamic microscopy unveils nano coffee ring.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Label-free imaging and biomarker analysis of exosomes with plasmonic scattering microscopy.Chemical science · 2022Article
- Dielectrophoresis: An Approach to Increase Sensitivity, Reduce Response Time and to Suppress Nonspecific Binding in Biosensors?Biosensors · 2022Review
- A High Spatiotemporal Iontronic Single-Cell Viscometer.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Quantification of the charge transport processes inside carbon nanopipettes.Chemical science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The continuing interest in nanoscale research has spurred the development of nanosensors for liquid phase measurements. These include nanopore-based sensors typically employed for detecting nanoscale objects, such as nanoparticles, vesicles and biomolecules, and electrochemical nanosensors suitable for identification and quantitative analysis of redox active molecules. In this Perspective, we discuss conductive nanopipettes (CNP) that can combine the advantages of single entity sensitivity of nanopore detection with high selectivity and capacity for quantitative analysis offered by electrochemical sensors. Additionally, the small physical size and needle-like shape of a CNP enables its use as a tip in the scanning electrochemical microscope (SECM), thus, facilitating precise positioning and localized measurements in biological systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.