Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34123081›Full record

ReviewChemical science2020

Salient features of the

Annu Anna Thomas, Someshwar Nagamalla, Shyam Sathyamoorthi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Negamycin: Nature's Forgotten Antibiotic.ACS infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. TetheredTetrahedron · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sulfamate-TetheredThe Journal of organic chemistry · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Metal-Free Synthesis ofFrontiers in chemistry · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Tethered Silanoxyiodination of Alkenes.The Journal of organic chemistry · 2021
    Article
  19. Sulfamate-tetheredMedicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annu Anna ThomasDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA ssathyam@ku.edu.
Someshwar NagamallaDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA ssathyam@ku.edu.
Shyam SathyamoorthiDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA ssathyam@ku.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-7349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intramolecular

Identifiers

PMID34123081
PMCPMC8163389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.