ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2021
Application of 3D Printing in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Efficacy and Accuracy of 3D-Printed Medical Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Research progress of 3D-printed PLGA scaffolds for the treatment of bone defects.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Review
- Advances in 3D Printing Applications for Personalized Orthopedic Surgery: From Anatomical Modeling to Patient-Specific Implants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgery: A review of current and future applications.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Innovative 3D printing technologies and advanced materials revolutionizing orthopedic surgery: current applications and future directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Impact of 3D printing on Orthopedic Surgery in India: Has the Technology Really Arrived!Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Reliably calibrating X-ray images required for preoperative planning of THA using a device-adapted magnification factor.PloS one · 2024Article
- Effects of Aging on Osteosynthesis at Bone-Implant Interfaces.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Early outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using point-of-care manufactured patient-specific instruments: a single university hospital's initial experience.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- Personalized additive manufacturing of devices for the management of enteroatmospheric fistulas.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of three-dimensional printed planning in Paprosky III acetabular defects: a case-control and cost-comparison analysis.International orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Reconceptualization of Trochlear Dysplasia in Patients With Recurrent Patellar Dislocation Using 3-Dimensional Models.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- From Three-Dimensional (3D)- to 6D-Printing Technology in Orthopedics: Science Fiction or Scientific Reality?Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIdeal surgical positioning and placement of implants during arthroplasty are crucial for long-term survival and optimal functional outcomes. Inadequate bone stock or defects, and anatomical variations can influence the outcomes. Three-dimensional printing (3DP) is an evolving technology that could provide patient-specific instrumentation and implants for arthroplasty, taking into account anatomical variations and defects. However, its application in this field is still not adequately studied and described. The present review was conceptualised to assess the practicality, the pros and cons and the current status of usage of 3DP in the field of hip and knee arthroplasties and joint reconstruction surgeries.
methodsA PubMed database search was conducted and a total number of 135 hits were obtained, out of which only 30 articles were relevant. These 30 studies were assessed to obtain the qualitative evidence of the applicability and the current status of 3D printing in arthroplasty.
resultsCurrently, 3DP is used for preoperative planning with 3D models, to assess bone defects and anatomy, to determine the appropriate cuts and to develop patient-specific instrumentation and implants (cages, liners, tibial base plates, femoral stem). Its models can be used for teaching and training young surgeons, as well as patient education regarding the surgical complexities. The outcomes of using customised instrumentations and implants have been promising and 3D printing can evolve into routine practice in the years to come.
conclusion3D printing in arthroplasty is an evolving field with promising results; however, current evidence is insufficient to determine significant advantages that can be termed cost effective and readily available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.