Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34122656›Full record

ReviewAnimal reproduction2021

One Conservation: the integrated view of biodiversity conservation.

Cristiane Schilbach Pizzutto, Helen Colbachini, Pedro Nacib Jorge-Neto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal reproduction, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cryopreservation of jaguar (Animal reproduction · 2026
    Article
  4. Histological features ofAnimal reproduction · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Strategies for advancing inclusive biodiversity research through equitable practices and collective responsibility.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cryopreservation of jaguar (Animal reproduction · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristiane Schilbach PizzuttoFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-4357-5133
Helen ColbachiniAquário de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-9717-9403
Pedro Nacib Jorge-NetoFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-0148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current global situation requires urgent decision-making to reverse processes of mass extinction of thousands of species. As a way of showing the importance of joint actions in this process, we aim to present the concept of One Conservation as a new proposal for the integration of sustainability,

Indexed as

ex situin situreproductionsustainabilitywildlife

Identifiers

PMID34122656
PMCPMC8190570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.