Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34122570›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2021

Dosimetric comparison between interstitial brachytherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for tumor bed boost in breast cancer.

Kannan Periasamy, Gunaseelan Karunanithi, Shamsudheen Cholayil, Kadambari Dharanipragada, Vijayprabhu Neelakanadan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The value of brachytherapy in the age of advanced external beam radiotherapy: a review of the literature in terms of dosimetry.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kannan PeriasamyDepartment of Radiotherapy, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Gunaseelan KarunanithiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Shamsudheen CholayilMVR Cancer Centre, Kozhikode, India.
Kadambari DharanipragadaDepartment of General Surgery, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Vijayprabhu NeelakanadanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, JIPMER, Puducherry, India.
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INRegional Cancer Center, Thiruvananthapuram · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo dosimetrically compare high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for tumor bed boost, following breast conservative treatment. MATERIAL AND

methods50 patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent breast conservation surgery, followed by either HDR-BT (

resultsHeart sparing was similar in both modalities (left-sided breast irradiation, HDR-BT D

conclusionsHDR-BT-based tumor bed boost irradiation results in significantly lower doses to most organs at risk with similar heart sparing compared to VMAT.

Indexed as

breast neoplasmsinterstitial brachytherapyradiotherapyvolumetric-modulated arc therapy

Identifiers

PMID34122570
PMCPMC8170527
OpenAlexW3164917298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.