Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34122568›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2021

Non-anesthetist-administered moderate sedation with midazolam and fentanyl for outpatient MRI-aided hybrid intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy in cervix cancer: a single-institution experience.

Kiattisa Sommat, Jeannie Yi Xin Lin, Melvin Ming Long Chew, Chiat Sian Loh, Jorene Siew Kee Liew, Yong Wee Foo, Jin Wei Kwek, Tiffany Hennedige, June Pheck Suan Goh, Tong Khee Tan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kiattisa SommatDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Jeannie Yi Xin LinDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Melvin Ming Long ChewDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Chiat Sian LohDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Jorene Siew Kee LiewDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Yong Wee FooDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Jin Wei KwekDivision of Oncologic Imaging, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Tiffany HennedigeDivision of Oncologic Imaging, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
June Pheck Suan GohDepartment of Anesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Tong Khee TanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
National Cancer Centre Singapore · SGSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of interstitial brachytherapy under non-anesthetist-administered moderate sedation, to identify factors influencing the insertion, and the total procedural time. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 47 insertions with hybrid intracavitary and interstitial applicators were performed in 23 patients from March 2017 to March 2020. Moderate sedation was achieved with intravenous midazolam and fentanyl administered by non-anesthetist. Insertion time and procedural time was recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the impact of different factors on insertion and procedural time.

resultsA total of 238 needles (range, 2-8 per insertion) were implanted, with an average insertion depth of 30 mm (range, 20-40 mm). The mean doses for midazolam and fentanyl were 3 mg (standard deviation [SD] = 1) and 53.3 mcg (SD = 23.9) per insertion, respectively. The median insertion time was 30 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] = 22-40), and the median total procedural time was 4.3 hours (IQR = 3.6-5.2). First time insertion, insertions performed before 2019, and higher midazolam dose were associated with significantly longer insertion time, whereas longer insertion time, MRI-based planning, and insertions performed before 2019 were associated with significantly longer total procedural time.

conclusionsOutpatient interstitial brachytherapy with non-anesthetist-administered sedation is achievable and well-tolerated. This method may significantly lessen the burden on hospital resources and has the potential to be cost-effective.

Indexed as

interstitial brachytherapyMRI-aidedsedation

Identifiers

PMID34122568
PMCPMC8170517
OpenAlexW3158165538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.