Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34122558›Full record

ArticleStem cells international2021

Long-Term Effects of Adjuvant Intravitreal Treatment with Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived Lineage-Negative Cells in Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Marta P Wiącek, Wojciech Gosławski, Aleksandra Grabowicz, Anna Sobuś, Miłosz P Kawa, Bartłomiej Baumert, Edyta Paczkowska, Sławomir Milczarek, Bogumiła Osękowska, Krzysztof Safranow and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Autologous blood in the management of ocular surface disorders.World journal of experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Stem cell therapy in retinal diseases.Neural regeneration research · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta P WiącekFirst Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-5030
Wojciech GosławskiSecond Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Aleksandra GrabowiczFirst Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7218-269X
Anna SobuśDepartment of General Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8155-7470
Miłosz P KawaDepartment of General Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9623-9662
Bartłomiej BaumertDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-5844
Edyta PaczkowskaDepartment of General Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-9741
Sławomir MilczarekDepartment of General Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4445-6192
Bogumiła OsękowskaDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, 71-252 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9348-8652
Krzysztof SafranowDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9415-2758
Alicja ZawiślakDepartment of General Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2036-2853
Wojciech LubińskiSecond Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3729-9750
Bogusław MachalińskiDepartment of General Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6013-0419
Anna MachalińskaFirst Department of Ophthalmology, Pomeranian Medical University, Powst. Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1190-717X
Pomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutologous bone marrow-derived lineage-negative (Lin-) cells present antiapoptotic and neuroprotective activity. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of novel autologous Lin- cell therapy during a 12-month follow-up period.

methodsIntravitreal injection of Lin- cells in 30 eyes with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) was performed. The fellow eyes (FEs) were considered control eyes. Functional and morphological eye examinations were performed before and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the injection.

resultsPatients whose symptoms started less than 10 years ago gained 14 ± 10 letters, while those with a longer disease duration gained 2.86 ± 8.54 letters compared to baseline at the 12-month follow-up (

conclusionLin- cell-based therapy is safe and effective, especially for a well-selected group of RP patients who still maintained good function of the foveal cones.

Identifiers

PMID34122558
PMCPMC8192192
OpenAlexW3170302683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.