Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34122479›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Effects of Seaweed Extracts on the Growth, Physiological Activity, Cane Yield and Sucrose Content of Sugarcane in China.

Diwen Chen, Wenling Zhou, Jin Yang, Junhua Ao, Ying Huang, Dachun Shen, Yong Jiang, Zhenrui Huang, Hong Shen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrated Valorization ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of a Sugarcane (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Diwen ChenCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenling ZhouInstitute of Bioengineering, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Jin YangCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Junhua AoInstitute of Bioengineering, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Ying HuangInstitute of Bioengineering, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Dachun ShenInstitute of Bioengineering, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yong JiangInstitute of Bioengineering, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenrui HuangCrops Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Hong ShenCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Academy of Sciences · CNKey Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CNGuangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seaweed extracts (SEs) have been widely used as biostimulants in crop management due to their growth-promoting and stress-resistant effects. To date, there are few reports of the effect of SEs on sucrose content and cane yield. Here, we conducted field experiments for three consecutive growth seasons (2017∼2019) in two areas (Suixi and Wengyuan) of China, to investigate the yield and sugar content of sugarcane in response to SE treatment at different growth stages. The results showed that spraying SEs once at seedling (S), early elongation (E), and early mature (M) stages, respectively, once at S and E stages, respectively, or once at the S stage increased the cane yield by 9.23, 9.01, and 3.33%, respectively, implying that SEs application at the early elongation stage played a vital role in promoting sugarcane growth. Photosynthetic parameters and nutrient efficiency analysis showed that spraying SEs at S and E stages enhanced the net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and water use efficiency, and increased N, P, or K utilization efficiency, compared with those of the control. Notably, cane yield increasing rate of SEs in 2017 and 2018 were higher than those in 2019 in Wengyuan but lower than those in 2019 in Suixi. Interestingly, the total rainfall and monthly average rainfall in 2017 and 2018 were lower than those in 2019 in Wengyuan but higher than those in 2019 in Suixi. The results suggested that the yield increasing rate of SEs on sugarcane was better in less rainfall years. The sucrose content of sugarcane showed no difference between spraying SEs at the M stage alone or at the three growth stages but was higher than those of SE treatments at S and/or E stages. Enzyme activity analysis showed that spraying SEs at the M stage increased the activity of sucrose phosphate synthase activity by 9.14% in leaves and 15.16% in stems, and decreased soluble acid invertase activity in stems by 16.52%, which contributed to the sucrose increase of 5.00%. The above results suggested that SEs could increase cane yield and promote sucrose accumulation in sugarcane. The yield increasing effect was more obvious under conditions of drought stress.

Indexed as

foliar applicationphotosynthesisseaweed extractssucrosesugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)

Identifiers

PMID34122479
PMCPMC8189154
OpenAlexW3164139539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.