Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34122379›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021

Differential Impact of Plant Secondary Metabolites on the Soil Microbiota.

Vadim Schütz, Katharina Frindte, Jiaxin Cui, Pengfan Zhang, Stéphane Hacquard, Paul Schulze-Lefert, Claudia Knief, Margot Schulz, Peter Dörmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cyclic Isothiocyanate Goitrin ImpairsPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vadim SchützInstitute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, Bonn, Germany.
Katharina FrindteInstitute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Molecular Biology of the Rhizosphere, Bonn, Germany.
Jiaxin CuiInstitute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, Bonn, Germany.
Pengfan ZhangMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Stéphane HacquardMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Paul Schulze-LefertMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Claudia KniefInstitute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Molecular Biology of the Rhizosphere, Bonn, Germany.
Margot SchulzInstitute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, Bonn, Germany.
Peter DörmannInstitute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology of Plants, Bonn, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant metabolites can shape the microbial community composition in the soil. Two indole metabolites, benzoxazolinone (BOA) and gramine, produced by different Gramineae species, and quercetin, a flavonoid synthesized by many dicot species, were studied for their impacts on the community structure of field soil bacteria. The three plant metabolites were directly added to agricultural soil over a period of 28 days. Alterations in bacterial composition were monitored by next generation sequencing of 16S

Indexed as

bacteriabenzoxazinoidbenzoxazolinonegraminemicrobiotaquercetinsoil

Identifiers

PMID34122379
PMCPMC8195599
OpenAlexW3167470508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.